Development and and Use of a Knowledge Translation Tool: The Rehabilitation Measures Database
Development and and Use of a Knowledge Translation Tool: The Rehabilitation Measures Database
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.apmr.2013.09.010
复制
发表时间：
2014-01-01
影响因子：
4.3
通讯作者：
Heinemann, Allen W.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Moore, Jennifer L.;Raad, Jason;Heinemann, Allen W.
研究证据的临床翻译是康复临床医生面临的挑战。公开访问和免费的在线教育资源，总结研究证据可以支持研究证据的实施。最近开发了一些在线资源，以克服常识翻译障碍。康复措施数据库（RMD）是一个免费的，基于网络的标准化工具的可搜索数据库，旨在支持知识翻译。它帮助临床医生选择有效和敏感的工具来筛查患者，监测进展和评估康复结果。RMD是根据焦点小组和beta测试参与者的反馈开发的。自2011年推出以来，RMD的使用已经增长到平均每天1851次，来自168个国家。截至2013年9月，在RMD中可查看202份仪器摘要。大多数摘要都与文书副本或购买说明相链接。更新和扩大RMD的一个挑战是确保资源，以确保其未来。与健康科学专业协会和研究生课程的合作关系对于维持这一资源至关重要。Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2014;95：197-202（c）2014美国康复医学大会
Clinical translation of research evidence is a challenge for rehabilitation clinicians. Publicly accessible and free, online educational resources that summarize research evidence can support implementation of research evidence into practice. Several online resources have been developed recently to overcome common knowledge translation bathers. The Rehabilitation Measures Database (RMD) is a free, web-based searchable database of standardized instruments that was designed to support knowledge translation. It helps clinicians select valid and sensitive instruments for screening patients, monitoring progress, and assessing rehabilitation outcomes. The RMD was developed using feedback from focus groups and beta-test participants. Since its launch in 2011, RMD use has grown to an average of 1851 hits per day from 168 countries. As of September 2013, 202 instrument summaries are viewable in the RMD. Most summaries are linked to copies of the instrument or to purchase instructions. A challenge in updating and expanding the RMD is securing the resources to ensure its future. Collaborative relationships with professional associations and graduate programs in the health sciences are critical in sustaining this resource. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2014;95:197-202(c) 2014 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine