Who Comes Out With Their Mental Illness and How Does It Help?

Who Comes Out With Their Mental Illness and How Does It Help?
复制标题

DOI:
10.1097/nmd.0000000000000461
复制
发表时间:
2016-03-01
影响因子:
1.9
通讯作者:
Al-Khouja, Maya
Al-Khouja, Maya
中科院分区:
医学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Corrigan, Patrick W.;Michaels, Patrick J.;Al-Khouja, Maya

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

将精神疾病公之于众可能是减少自我羞辱的有效策略。这项研究探讨了出柜的预测因素和后果。报告外出(n = 79)或未外出(n = 27)的严重精神疾病参与者(N = 106)赞同外出的好处(BBO)和留在家中的原因。基线测量的预测因子是自我耻辱、自知力和精神病诊断。在基线和1个月随访时,还完成了三项结果测量:基本心理需求、护理参与和抑郁。在已经外出的参与者中,BBO和留在家中的原因与自我耻辱,洞察力和终身情感诊断显著独立相关。在后果方面,BBO与那些已经退出的参与者的横截面和1个月的参与措施有关,但不适用于封闭的参与者。在未公开的参与者中,BBO与基线和1个月的基本心理需求测量相关。被认为是为了促进披露,以减少自我耻辱的策略的影响。
Coming out with mental illness may be an effective strategy for reducing self-stigma. This study examined predictors and consequences of coming out. Participants (N = 106) with severe mental illness who reported being out (n = 79) or not out (n = 27) endorsed benefits of being out (BBOs) and reasons for staying in. Predictors from baseline measures were self-stigma, insight, and psychiatric diagnosis. Three outcome measuresbasic psychological needs, care engagement, and depressionwere also completed at baseline and 1-month follow-up. Among participants already out, BBOs and reasons for staying in were significantly and independently associated with self-stigma, insight, and lifetime affective diagnoses. In terms of consequences, BBOs were associated with cross-sectional and 1-month measures of engagement for those already out, but not for closeted participants. Among closeted participants, BBOs were associated with baseline and 1-month measures of basic psychological needs. Implications for strategies meant to promote disclosure in order to decrease self-stigma are considered.