Clarification and purpose of the race-based traumatic stress injury model
Clarification and purpose of the race-based traumatic stress injury model
复制标题
DOI：
10.1177/0011000006295120
复制
发表时间：
2007-01-01
影响因子：
3.4
通讯作者：
Carter, Robert T.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Carter, Robert T.
作者回应了汤普森-米勒和费根、格里芬、斯皮特和布莱恩特-戴维斯在本期所作的四种反应。作为回应，他澄清了他的主要贡献中提出的模型的目的，并补充了关于该模型的法律和法医应用的信息，但没有涉及任何细节。他还讨论了使用“伤害”来描述种族主义的危害的目的、心理学和法学的交集，以及法律定义在努力理解种族主义对心理健康的影响方面是如何无用的。他进一步指出，客观和主观压力都是有害的，因为在种族主义方面，似乎有一种倾向于贬低主观经验。最后，作者承认反应作者提出的观点，这些观点是对他提出的基于种族的创伤应激损伤模型的延伸和扩展。
The author responds to the four reactions authored by Thompson-Miller and Feagin, Griffin, Speight, and Bryant-Davis in this issue. In responding, he clarifies the purpose of the model presented in his major contribution and adds information about the model's legal and forensic applications that lie did not touch on with any detail. He also discusses the purpose of the use of "injury" to describe the harm of racism, the intersection of psychology and law, and how legal definitions are not useful in the effort to understand the mental health effects of racism. He further points out that both objective and subjective stressors are harmful since, where racism is concerned, there seems to be a tendency to discount subjective experience. Lastly, the author acknowledges points made by the reaction authors that extend and expand the model of race-based traumatic stress injury he presented.