Questioning sustainability in health promotion projects and programs.
Questioning sustainability in health promotion projects and programs.
复制标题
质疑健康促进项目和计划的可持续性。
DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2005
影响因子:
2.7
通讯作者:
L. S. St Leger
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
L. S. St Leger
The documented plans of most Health Promotion projects and programs usually contain the word ‘sustainability’. Some even identify specifically what is intended to be sustained, after the project or program funding resources cease. Yet, many plans do not tease out those important aspects of the intervention which are worth sustaining. Nor do they identify whether the intervention itself actually nurtures the processes necessary to ensure the stated intentions have a reasonable chance of being sustained. For too long we have paid little attention to what we mean by sustainability in Health Promotion. This has occurred in both developed and developing countries and in small and large projects and programs. We have not reflected thoroughly and regularly on the many health promotion interventions that have achieved some significant degree of sustainability successes, and learnt from them. The landmark North Karelia project in Finland and the many tobacco reduction programs across the world provide a rich source of evidence for such examination and analysis. How often do we ask—‘Is this action/goal/ organisation worth sustaining anyway?’ Perhaps health promotion should focus instead on the evolvement of actions/goals/organisations? Recently, a number of researchers have sought to interrogate the concept of sustainability in health promotion, and to develop frameworks and guidelines which will assist planners, practitioners, evaluators, managers, organisations and funding authorities. Swerisson and Crisp (2004) provided a thoughtful and practical contribution as they examined the concept of sustainability. They claimed: