A Comparison of Information Sources in the Study of Psychotic Illness
A Comparison of Information Sources in the Study of Psychotic Illness
复制标题
精神病研究信息来源比较
DOI：
10.1192/bjp.137.1.38
复制
发表时间：
1980
影响因子：
10.5
通讯作者：
I. Brockington
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
A. Downing;A. Francis;I. Brockington
总结50例精神病患者的临床特征，记录了与病人和近亲举行的访谈，简短的录像访谈和护士评级，除了医院的病例记录。三名评分员研究了所有可用的材料，并作出了主评级。将精神状态访谈中的评分与这些主评分进行比较，结果表明，这次访谈遗漏了大量同意存在的病理学。与近亲的面谈有助于确定躁狂症状。护士评级的基础上，8小时的观察期是不太有效的整体，但高度显着的协会与主评级实现了29/57研究领域。在四个方面（不合作行为，关心他人，激动和分心），它上级任何一个采访。
Summary The clinical features shown by 50 psychotic patients were documented by interviews held with the patient and next-of-kin, brief videotaped interviews and nurse rating in addition to the hospital case record. Three raters studied all the available material and made master ratings. Comparison of the ratings made at mental state interview with these master ratings showed that this interview missed a great deal of the pathology agreed to be present. The interview with the next-of-kin was helpful in identifying manic symptoms. Nurse rating based on an 8-hour period of observation was less effective overall, but highly significant associations with the master ratings were achieved in 29/57 areas studied. In four areas (uncooperative behaviour, concern for others, agitation and distractibility) it was superior to either interview.