Road Pricing: The Public Viewpoint
Road Pricing: The Public Viewpoint
复制标题
道路收费：公众的观点
DOI：
10.1007/978-94-011-0980-2_10
复制
发表时间：
1995
期刊：
影响因子：
6.7
通讯作者：
P. Jones
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
P. Jones
虽然不少运输界的学者和从业员现在认为引入道路使用者收费是一个非常有力的理由，因为这是一个让司机支付与其车辆使用有关的各种外在因素的机制，世界上有许多城市，由于公众的不良反应和政治压力，试图将这些原则应用于汽车交通的计划没有实施-尽管它们有相当大的技术价值。这些建议包括在伦敦和吉隆坡实行补充许可证制度的建议，在香港（Borins，1988）和荷兰（Stoelhorst和Zandbergen，1990）实行电子道路收费的建议，以及在美国增加汽油税的各种尝试。
While many academics and practitioners in the transport field now consider the case for introducing road user charging to be a very strong one, as a mechanism for making drivers pay the various externalities associated with their vehicle use, there are many cities around the world where schemes which sought to apply such principles to car traffic were not implemented due to adverse public reaction and political pressures — even though they had considerable technical merit. Instances include proposals for supplementary licensing in London and Kuala Lumpur, and for electronic road pricing in Hong Kong (Borins, 1988) and the Netherlands (Stoelhorst and Zandbergen, 1990), as well as the various attempts to increase petrol taxes in the United States.