Is PROMIS the new standard for patient-reported outcomes measures in orthopaedic trauma research?
Is PROMIS the new standard for patient-reported outcomes measures in orthopaedic trauma research?
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.injury.2019.10.076
复制
发表时间：
2020-05-01
影响因子：
2.5
通讯作者：
Klazinga, Niek S.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
O'Hara, Nathan N.;Richards, John T.;Klazinga, Niek S.
本综述描述了患者报告结局测量信息系统（PROMIS）架构的一些益处，确定了PROMIS测量在当前骨科创伤文献中的使用频率，并将PROMIS工具的功能与其他常用的患者报告结局测量（PROMs）进行了比较。PROMIS仪器有几个独特的元素，他们的架构，如项目反应理论，计算机化的自适应测试选项，并使用T分数缩放，从许多其他PROM区分的仪器。在过去的五年中，在高影响力的骨科期刊上发表的319项研究中报告了108种不同的PROM。PROMIS指标，包括PROMIS身体功能、疼痛干扰和上肢功能，仅在7项研究（2%）中使用。PROMIS措施被认为是可比的其他更常见的PROM的受访者负担，管理选项，心理评估骨折患者。可能的是，PROMIS测量在骨折人群中的有限熟悉度和可解释性仍然是骨科创伤研究中更广泛采用的最大障碍。(C)2019爱思唯尔有限公司版权所有。
This review describes some of the benefits of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) architecture, determined how frequently PROMIS measures were used in the current orthopaedic trauma literature, and compared the features of PROMIS instruments with other frequently used patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs). PROMIS instruments have several unique elements to their architecture, such as item response theory, computerized adaptive testing options, and scaling using T-scores, that differentiate the instruments from many other PROMs. Over the past five years, 108 different PROMs were reported in 319 studies published in high-impact orthopaedic journals. PROMIS measures, including PROMIS Physical Function, Pain Interference, and Upper Extremity Function, were only used in seven studies (2%). PROMIS measures were found to be comparable to other more common PROMs with respect to respondent burden, administration options, and psychometric assessments specific to fracture patients. Likely, the limited familiarity and interpretability of PROMIS measures in the fracture population remain the most substantial barriers to broader adoption in orthopaedic trauma research. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.