ORGANIZATION AND ACTIVATION OF ORTHOGRAPHIC KNOWLEDGE IN READING ALOUD
ORGANIZATION AND ACTIVATION OF ORTHOGRAPHIC KNOWLEDGE IN READING ALOUD
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/0096-1523.5.4.674
复制
发表时间：
1979-01-01
影响因子：
2.1
通讯作者：
GLUSHKO, RJ
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
GLUSHKO, RJ
共有44名大学生参加了三项实验，结果显示，像have这样的”例外”单词，其拼写与发音的对应关系不规则，比像haze这样的单词，其拼写与发音的对应关系规则，需要更长的时间来大声朗读。类似于不规则单词的“例外伪词”如tave，与类似于规则单词的”规则伪词”如taze相比，在发音延迟方面遭受类似的惩罚。“规则但不一致”的单词，如wave，有规则的拼写到声音结构，但类似于例外单词，比”规则和一致”的单词，如wade，发音时间更长。这些结果反驳了目前的说法，即单词是通过从记忆中提取一个单一的发音来大声朗读的，而假词是通过使用抽象的拼写发音规则来发音的。相反，单词和假词的发音似乎使用了类似的拼写和语音知识。(34参考）（PsycINFO数据库记录（c）2016阿帕，保留所有权利）
Three experiments on a total of 44 college students showed that" exception" words like have, with irregular spelling-to-sound correspondences, take longer to read aloud than words like haze, with regular correspondences." Exception pseudowords" like tave, which resemble irregular words, suffer a similar penalty in pronunciation latency compared to" regular pseudowords" like taze, which resemble regular words." Regular but inconsistent" words like wave, which have regular spelling-to-sound structure but resemble exception words, take longer to pronounce than" regular and consistent" words like wade. These results refute current claims that words are read aloud by retrieving a single pronunciation from memory and that pseudowords are pronounced by using abstract spelling-to-sound rules. Instead, it appears that words and pseudowords are pronounced using similar kinds of orthographic and phonological knowledge.(34 ref)(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)