Impact of the Integrative Oncology Scholars Program on Oncology Providers' Key Knowledge of Dietary Supplements and Antioxidants for Providing Evidence-based Oncology Care.
Impact of the Integrative Oncology Scholars Program on Oncology Providers' Key Knowledge of Dietary Supplements and Antioxidants for Providing Evidence-based Oncology Care.
复制标题
综合肿瘤学学者计划对肿瘤学提供者关于膳食补充剂和抗氧化剂的关键知识的影响，以提供循证肿瘤学护理。
DOI：
10.1007/s13187-023-02348-y
复制
发表时间：
2023
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Zick,SuzannaM
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Kadro,ZacharyO;Snyder,Sara;Benn,Rita;Fouladbakhsh,JudithM;Greenlee,Heather;Harris,RichardE;Henry,NLynn;Klein,KristinC;Mayhew,Sabrina;Spratke,Lisa;Walker,EleanorM;Zebrack,Bradley;Zick,SuzannaM
膳食补充剂通常用于癌症幸存者。肿瘤提供者很少接受有关膳食补充剂的培训。我们评估了电子学习模块是否可以提高肿瘤学提供者的膳食补充剂知识。肿瘤学提供者参加了国家癌症研究所资助的综合肿瘤学学者（IOS）计划。我们使用测试后准备保证测试（RAT）来衡量知识获取模块。一个队列完成了测试前后的RAT，以评估知识的变化。多元线性回归模型调整性别，种族，职业，和多年的实践中被用来确定这些特征是否与测试后的RAT性能和测试前到测试后的RAT分数的变化。学者（N= 101）包括86%（N= 87）的女性;年龄44 ± 10岁; 72%（N= 73）的非西班牙裔白色人;平均从业年限范围为11-15 ± 10年。有37名医生、11名医生助理、23名护士、21名社会工作者、2名心理学家、4名药剂师和2名理疗师。所有学者的测试后膳食补充剂和抗氧化剂RAT评分分别为67 ± 18%和71 ± 14%。在调整后的模型中，膳食补充剂和抗氧化剂测试后大鼠评分与学者特征之间没有显着关联。膳食补充剂和抗氧化剂的大鼠评分变化分别为25% ± 23和26% ± 27（P< 0.0001）。在调整后的模型中，饮食补充剂RAT的变化没有显着的预测因素。对于抗氧化剂RAT，职业与得分变化相关（P= 0.021）。Scholar考试成绩的提高表明，IOS计划可以显着提高肿瘤学提供者对膳食补充剂和抗氧化剂的了解。
Dietary supplements are commonly used among cancer survivors. Oncology providers rarely receive training about dietary supplements. We evaluated whether e-learning modules could improve oncology providers’ dietary supplement knowledge. Oncology providers participated in the National Cancer Institute funded Integrative Oncology Scholars (IOS) program. We used posttest readiness assurance tests (RAT) to measure knowledge acquisition from modules. One cohort completed a pre and posttest RAT to assess change in knowledge. Multivariate linear regression models adjusted for gender, race, profession, and years in practice were used to determine if these characteristics were associated with posttest RAT performance and change in pre to posttest RAT scores. Scholars (N= 101) included 86% (N= 87) females; age 44 ± 10 years; 72% (N= 73) Non-Hispanic White; years in practice mean range 11–15 ± 10. There were 37 physicians, 11 physician assistants, 23 nurses, 21 social workers, 2 psychologists, 4 pharmacists, and 2 physical therapists. The posttest dietary supplement and antioxidant RAT scores for all Scholars were 67 ± 18% and 71 ± 14%. In adjusted models there were no significant associations between dietary supplement and antioxidant posttest RAT scores with Scholar characteristics. Change in RAT scores for dietary supplement and antioxidants were 25% ± 23 and 26% ± 27 (P< 0.0001). In adjusted models, there were no significant predictors of change in dietary supplement RATs. For antioxidant RATs, profession was associated with change in scores (P= 0.021). Improvement in Scholar’s test scores demonstrate the IOS program can significantly increase oncology providers’ knowledge of dietary supplements and antioxidants.