Public Research and Industrial Innovation: A Comparison of US and European Innovation Systems in the Life Sciences

Public Research and Industrial Innovation: A Comparison of US and European Innovation Systems in the Life Sciences
复制标题

公共研究与产业创新:美国和欧洲生命科学创新体系比较

DOI:
10.4337/9781781950241.00019
复制
发表时间:
2007
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
F. Pammolli
F. Pammolli
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
M. Riccaboni;Jason Owen;W. Powell;F. Pammolli

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

这本书重新审视了公共政策的基本原理,得出的结论是,流行的“公共知识”模式正在朝着知识生产和使用的网络或分布式模式演变,其中公共和私人机构发挥互补作用。它提供了一套工具和模型来评估新的网络供资和治理模式的影响,并认为政府需要调整其供资和行政优先事项和程序,以支持研究网络的出现和健康发展。这本书接着解释说,知识的生产和传播的相互依存性和互补性要求政府采取一种新的、更有背景的、灵活和复杂的方法来进行资助、监测和评估。
This book re-examines the rationale for public policy, concluding that the prevailing ‘public knowledge' model is evolving towards a networked or distributed model of knowledge production and use in which public and private institutions play complementary roles. It provides a set of tools and models to assess the impact of the new network model of funding and governance, and argues that governments need to adapt their funding and administrative priorities and procedures to support the emergence and healthy growth of research networks. The book goes on to explain that interdependencies and complementarities in the production and distribution of knowledge require a new and more contextual, flexible and complex approach to government funding, monitoring and assessment.