Elimination and inclusion procedures in judgment.
Elimination and inclusion procedures in judgment.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1002/(sici)1099-0771(199709)10:3
复制
发表时间：
1997-09
影响因子：
2
通讯作者：
Ilan Yaniv;Y. Schul
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Ilan Yaniv;Y. Schul
考虑从一组多个选项中选择答案的两个判断程序。人们可以通过从初始备选方案集中包括可能的备选方案，或者通过从相同的初始集合中删除最不可能的备选方案来回答问题。一个有趣的问题是，这两个评判过程是否相等，并产生相同的最终选择。两项研究的结果表明，个人在淘汰过程中产生的候选集合比在纳入过程中生成的候选集合要大得多，同时准确率也有所提高。我们证明了这一发现是排除和包含的非互补性的合乎逻辑的结果，并提出了一个带有两个标准的筛选模型来解释结果。#1997 John Wiley&Sons，Ltd.
Consider two judgment procedures for selecting an answer from a set of multiple alternatives. One could answer a question either by including likely alternatives from the initial set of alternatives or by eliminating the least likely alternatives from that same initial set. An interesting question is whether the two judgment processes are equivalent and yield the same final selection. The results from two studies indicate that individuals generate significantly larger sets of candidates in an elimination process than in an inclusion process, with concurrent increase in accuracy. We show that this finding is a logical consequence of the noncomplementarity of elimination and inclusion, and suggest a screening model with two criteria to explain the results. #1997 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.