Epigenetic age acceleration changes 2 years after antiretroviral therapy initiation in adults with HIV: a substudy of the NEAT001/ANRS143 randomised trial
Epigenetic age acceleration changes 2 years after antiretroviral therapy initiation in adults with HIV: a substudy of the NEAT001/ANRS143 randomised trial
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/s2352-3018(21)00006-0
复制
发表时间:
2021-04-01
期刊:
影响因子:
16.1
通讯作者:
Arribas, Jose R.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Esteban-Cantos, Andres;Rodriguez-Centeno, Javier;Arribas, Jose R.
Background DNA methylation-based estimators of biological age are reliable biomarkers of the ageing process. We aimed to investigate a range of epigenetic ageing biomarkers in a subshrdy of the NEAT001/ANRS143 clinical trial, which compared ritonavir-boosted darunavir with either raltegravir or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine in antiretroviral therapy (ART)-naive adults.Methods We analysed frozen whole blood samples from 168 ART-naive participants with HIV from the NEAT001/ANRS143 trial, before ART initiation and after 2 years of ART (84 participants on ritonavir-boosted darunavir with raltegravir and 84 participants on ritonavir-boosted darunavir with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine). We also included 44 participants without HIV with a similar age and sex distribution. We analysed DNA methylation. Epigenetic age estimators (Horvath's clock, Hannum's clock, GrimAge, and PhenoAge) and estimated leucocyte compositions were generated using Horvath's New Online Methylation Age Calculator and Houseman's method. We calculated epigenetic age acceleration measures for each estimator of epigenetic age. The NEAT001/ANRS143 trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01066962.Findings Compared with the HIV-uninfected group, ART-naive participants with HIV showed higher epigenetic age acceleration (EAA) according to all EAA estimators (mean 2.5 years, 95% CI 1.89-3-22 for Horvath-EAA; 1.4 years, 0.74-1.99 for Hannum-EAA; 2.8 years, 1.97-3-68 for GrimAge-EAA; and 7.3 years, 6.40-8.13 for PhenoAge-EAA), with all differences being statistically significant except for Hannum-EAA (Horvath-EAA p=0.0008; Hannum-EAA p=0.059; GrimAge-EAA p=0.0021; and PhenoAge-EAA p