Comments on Item Selection Procedures
Comments on Item Selection Procedures
复制标题
对项目选择程序的评论
DOI：
10.1027/1015-5759/a000196
复制
发表时间：
2014
影响因子：
2.5
通讯作者：
M. Ziegler
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
M. Ziegler
在过去的12个月里，我有幸阅读了一些提交给《欧洲心理评估杂志》的非常好的论文。很多时候，我对这些论文的评论反映了我过于乐观的印象。然而，有时提交的材料不仅令人印象深刻和合理；有时一篇论文的潜力是可见的，但隐藏在方法和分析问题之下。我想不时地使用社论页面，概述审查者经常提出的问题，并将其用作批评甚至拒绝提交材料的理由。我的目标是赞助；相反，我的目标是解决一些反复出现的问题，希望在未来消除这些问题，从而提高杂志的整体质量。在这篇社论中，我想重点关注项目选择的过程。
Over the last 12 months I have had the pleasure to read some extraordinarily good papers that were submitted to the European Journal of Psychological Assessment. Oftentimes, my overly positive impression was mirrored by the reviews obtained for these papers. However, sometimes the submissions are not only impressive and sound; sometimes the potential of a paper is visible but buried beneath methodological and analytical problems. From time to time I would like to use the editorial pages and provide an overview of issues often raised by reviewers and used as reasons to criticize or even reject a submission. My goal is to patronize; rather, my aim is to address some reoccurring issues in the hopes of eliminating them in the future and thereby improving the journal’s overall quality. In this Editorial I want to focus on the process of item selection.