Systematic Review of the Check-in, Check-out Intervention for Students At Risk for Emotional and Behavioral Disorders
Systematic Review of the Check-in, Check-out Intervention for Students At Risk for Emotional and Behavioral Disorders
复制标题
DOI：
10.1353/etc.2014.0030
复制
发表时间：
2014-11-01
影响因子：
1
通讯作者：
Barrett, Courtenay A.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Hawken, Leanne S.;Bundock, Kaitlin;Barrett, Courtenay A.
本系统性文献综述的目的是总结在小学和中学环境中进行入组和退出（CICO）干预的结果。本综述纳入了28项采用单一受试者和组（实验和准实验）设计的研究。8项组研究的中位效应量对于报告Cohen d或类似效应量的研究较小（中位d = 0.37;范围，-0.15至0.60），对于报告有利于实施CICO的R-2型效应量的研究较大（0.23;范围，0.13至0.32）。对于单一受试者设计研究，20项研究的总体中位PND为68%（范围，0 - 100%），表明CICO的有效性值得怀疑，但接近Scruggs和Mastropieri（1998）提出的有效性标准（>= 70% PND）。实践的影响进行了讨论沿着与建议，为今后的研究。
The purpose of this systematic literature review was to summarize outcomes of the Check-in Check-out (CICO) intervention across elementary and secondary settings. Twenty-eight studies utilizing both single subject and group (experimental and quasi-experimental) designs were included in this review. Median effect sizes across the eight group studies were small (median d = .37; range, -.15 to .60) for studies reporting Cohen's d or similar effect sizes and large (.23; range, .13 to .32) for studies reporting R-2 type effect sizes favoring the implementation of CICO. For single subject design studies, the overall median PND across 20 studies was 68% (range, 0 to 100%), indicating CICO is questionably effective but approaching the effectiveness criterion (>= 70% PND) suggested by Scruggs and Mastropieri (1998). Implications for practice are discussed along with suggestions for future research.