Gatekeeping versus direct-access when patient information matters.

Gatekeeping versus direct-access when patient information matters.
复制标题

当患者信息很重要时,守门与直接访问。

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2009
期刊:
影响因子:
2.1
通讯作者:
Paula González
Paula González
中科院分区:
医学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Paula González

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

我们开发了一个委托代理模型,其中卫生当局作为一个主要的病人和全科医生(GP)。本文的目的是权衡的优势,守门与非守门的方法,以医疗保健时,病人的自我健康信息和病人的压力,全科医生提供转介专业护理。我们发现,当全科医生的激励措施很重要时,只有当(i)患者转诊压力足够高,(ii)患者自我健康信息的质量既不高度不准确(在这种情况下,患者的自我转诊效率将非常低),也不高度准确(在这种情况下,全科医生的代理问题将非常昂贵)时,非守门系统才是可取的。
We develop a principal-agent model in which the health authority acts as a principal for both a patient and a general practitioner (GP). The goal of the paper is to weigh the merits of gatekeeping versus non-gatekeeping approaches to health care when patient self-health information and patient pressure on GPs to provide referrals for specialized care are considered. We find that, when GPs incentives matter, a non-gatekeeping system is preferable only when (i) patient pressure to refer is sufficiently high and (ii) the quality of the patient's self-health information is neither highly inaccurate (in which case the patient's self-referral will be very inefficient) nor highly accurate (in which case the GP's agency problem will be very costly).