THEORY OF MAXIMA AND METHOD OF LAGRANGE
THEORY OF MAXIMA AND METHOD OF LAGRANGE
复制标题
DOI:
10.1137/0120037
复制
发表时间:
1971-01-01
影响因子:
1.9
通讯作者:
AFRIAT, SN
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
AFRIAT, SN
1. Introduction. The method of Lagrange (1762)(Courant [6, vol. I]) for determining a maximum of a function with constraints does not distinguish between a maximum and a minimum, nor between a maximum and an absolute maximum. Further conditions which allow such distinctions to be made have been brought into view more recently by Hancock [11], buthis treatment lacks completeness. The subject has importance in economics and the account of Samuelson 17], which is along the same lines as thatof Hancock, is most familiar. A further exposition is given by Frisch [10]. Here there is a treatment of some principal results. The approach is by two routes involving differentuses of the implicit function theorem (Carath6odory [5], Rudin [16]). A proof is given of that theorem, and corollaries are deduced which have application to functional dependence and Lagrangian theory. The differentiability of the maximum functionof the constraint variables is established in any neighborhood where the function is defined, and its derivatives are identified with Lagrangian variables.More generally, when the objective and constraint functions carry further variables as parameters, expressions are found for the derivatives of the maximum point and of the Lagrangian multipliers with respect to these parameters, when these exist, and conditions for existence are shown. Then the identity is established between the derivatives of the maximum value and of the Lagrangian function, with respect to the parameters. This is seen to generalize the usual identification of Lagrangian multipliers with derivatives. Hancock’s conditions require a quadratic form to be definite subject to linear constraints. He obtained a determinantal form for such a condition, and then Mann [15] derived the condition in thesimpler determinantal form which is most well known. The special case of one constraint is dealt with by Ferrar 8]. It has a peculiar further development in the consumer theory of Slutsky [18](Hicks [12, Appendix]). Another derivation together with a dual version and related expressions in terms of Grassmann coordinates is given by Afriat [1]. Here another derivation is provided. Finsler [9] obtained a different form for the conditions, considered also by Afriat 2] and Bellman 4]. Throughout this paper, x> _ y for vectors means xi>= yi for each element, x> y means x> y but x-y, and x> y means x> y. Also, R denotes the column vectors of order m, or the m 1 matrices, with elements in R, R being the real numbers; R, denotes the real row vectors of order n, or 1 n matrices, and R denotes the real m n matrices.