What Are the Role and Impact of Public-Private Partnerships in Education? A Realist Evaluation of the Chilean Education Quasi-Market
What Are the Role and Impact of Public-Private Partnerships in Education? A Realist Evaluation of the Chilean Education Quasi-Market
复制标题
公私合作伙伴关系在教育领域的作用和影响是什么？
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2016
影响因子：
1.8
通讯作者：
Adrián Zancajo
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Antoni Verger;Xavier Bonal;Adrián Zancajo
市场机制在提供教育方面的优势是在公私伙伴关系制度下重新得到强调的一个前提。一系列国际组织、发展机构和学者热烈拥护公私伙伴关系的核心思想，其基础是这样一种假设，即公立和私立学校之间的竞争是提高教育质量和效率的有效手段。购买力平价政策框架预计将建立真正的市场动态，其中供应商创新并提高其教育服务的质量，以此来吸引家庭，这些家庭被描绘为利益最大化者和消息灵通的消费者。然而，在现实世界条件下，这些市场理念在教育中的应用受到了一系列修改和失败的影响。这项研究基于智利--世界上最市场化的教育体系--的案例，考察了由于供给结构的性质以及代理人的预期和行为的影响，市场化提供的理所当然的好处很少被实现或能够实现。
The superiority of market mechanisms in educational provision is a premise that has received renewed emphasis under the regime of public-private partnerships (PPPs). The central idea of PPPs—enthusiastically embraced by a range of international organizations, development agencies and scholars—is grounded in the assumption that competition between public and private schools is an effective means of promoting education quality and efficiency. PPP policy frameworks are expected to establish genuine market dynamics in which suppliers innovate and boost the quality of their education services as a way to attract families, who are portrayed as benefit maximizers and well-informed consumers. The application of these market ideas to education, however, has suffered from a series of modifications and failures under real world conditions. This study is based on the case of Chile—the most market-oriented education system in the world—and examines how few of the taken-for-granted benefits of market-oriented provision either have been or can be fulfilled, due to the nature of the supply structure and to the effects of agents’ expectations and behaviors.