Further analysis of subtypes of automatically reinforced SIB: A replication and quantitative analysis of published datasets.
Further analysis of subtypes of automatically reinforced SIB: A replication and quantitative analysis of published datasets.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1002/jaba.368
复制
发表时间：
2017-01
影响因子：
2.9
通讯作者：
Arevalo AR
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Hagopian LP;Rooker GW;Zarcone JR;Bonner AC;Arevalo AR
根据对功能分析条件变化的敏感性和自我约束的存在，评估了自动强化自伤行为(SIB)的亚型模型。目前的研究通过将该模型应用于1982至2015年间发布的自动增强的SIB的所有数据集来测试该模型的一般性。我们确定了49个数据集，这些数据集包含了足够的数据来进行亚型分析。与最初的研究相似，亚型1的SIB通常可以接受单独使用强化治疗，而亚型2的SIB则不能。由于数据集数量较少，无法得出关于亚型3 SIB的结论。然而，研究结果支持该模型的一般性，并表明SIB对交替增强的破坏的敏感性是自动增强的SIB的一个重要维度。研究结果还表明，自动强化的SIB不应再被认为是一个单一的类别，需要进行更多的研究，以更好地理解和治疗亚型SIB。
evaluated a model for subtyping automatically reinforced self-injurious behavior (SIB) based on its sensitivity to changes in functional analysis conditions and the presence of self-restraint. The current study tested the generality of the model by applying it to all datasets of automatically reinforced SIB published from 1982 to 2015. We identified 49 datasets that included sufficient data to permit subtyping. Similar to the original study, Subtype-1 SIB was generally amenable to treatment using reinforcement alone, whereas Subtype-2 SIB was not. Conclusions could not be drawn about Subtype-3 SIB due to the small number of datasets. Nevertheless, the findings support the generality of the model and suggest that sensitivity of SIB to disruption by alternative reinforcement is an important dimension of automatically reinforced SIB. Findings also suggest that automatically reinforced SIB should no longer be considered a single category and that additional research is needed to better understand and treat Subtype-2 SIB.