Pay-per-view in interlibrary loan: a case study
Pay-per-view in interlibrary loan: a case study
复制标题
DOI：
10.3163/1536-5050.100.2.007
复制
发表时间：
2012-04-01
影响因子：
2
通讯作者：
Brown, Heather L.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Brown, Heather L.
问：我的问题是从出版商那里购买文章是否是一种具有成本效益的馆际互借（ILL）方法？设定：内布拉斯加大学医学中心的McGoogan医学图书馆提供了案例研究。方法：2009年第一季度确定了需要支付版权费的已完成的ILL请求。从出版商那里购买这些文章的成本是从出版商的网站上获得的，并与全部ILL成本进行了比较。从publisher.Results购买文章的试点期间：第一季度的样本数据显示，如果从出版商购买的文章，大约可以节省500.00美元。试点期间和持续采购的做法，导致了显着节省为library.Conclusion：直接从出版商购买文章是一个具有成本效益的方法，负担高昂的版权使用费的图书馆。
Question: Can purchasing articles from publishers be a cost-effective method of interlibrary loan (ILL) for libraries owing significant copyright royalties?Setting: The University of Nebraska Medical Center's McGoogan Library of Medicine provides the case study.Method: Completed ILL requests that required copyright payment were identified for the first quarter of 2009. The cost of purchasing these articles from publishers was obtained from the publishers' websites and compared to the full ILL cost. A pilot period of purchasing articles from the publisher was then conducted.Results: The first-quarter sample data showed that approximately $500.00 could have been saved if the articles were purchased from the publisher. The pilot period and continued purchasing practice have resulted in significant savings for the library.Conclusion: Purchasing articles directly from the publisher is a cost-effective method for libraries burdened with high copyright royalty payments.