ATTENTION IN PIGEON - DIFFERENTIAL EFFECTS OF FOOD-GETTING VERSUS SHOCK-AVOIDANCE PROCEDURES
ATTENTION IN PIGEON - DIFFERENTIAL EFFECTS OF FOOD-GETTING VERSUS SHOCK-AVOIDANCE PROCEDURES
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/h0035300
复制
发表时间：
1973-01-01
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
LOLORDO, VM
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
FOREE, DD;LOLORDO, VM
经过训练的雄性白鸽（N= 12）在由音调和红光组成的复合刺激(a)下踩踏板以避免触电或(b)获得粮食。在没有复合刺激的情况下做出反应，推迟了下一次刺激的发生。在性能稳定后，确定了复合材料和各成分对踏板压力的控制程度。结果表明，在食欲测试中，化合物和光单独存在时产生了许多反应，但单独对音调产生的反应很少。在回避测试中，只有很少的反应发生在光单独存在的情况下，一个中间的数字出现在音调单独存在的情况下，大多数反应发生在化合物存在的情况下。（22 ref）（PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA，版权所有）
Trained male White Carneaux pigeons (N= 12) to depress a treadle in the presence of a compound stimulus consisting of a tone and a red house light (a) to avoid electric shock or (b) to obtain grain. Responding in the absence of the compound stimulus postponed its next occurrence. After performance had stabilized, the degree to which the compound and each element controlled treadle pressing was determined. Results show that in the appetitive test, many responses were made in the presence of the compound and the light alone, but very few were made to the tone alone. In the avoidance test, very few responses occurred in the presence of the light alone, an intermediate number to the tone alone, and most in the presence of the compound.(22 ref)(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)