Bradycardia and asystole with the use of vagus nerve stimulation for the treatment of epilepsy:: A rare complication of intraoperative device testing

Bradycardia and asystole with the use of vagus nerve stimulation for the treatment of epilepsy:: A rare complication of intraoperative device testing
复制标题

DOI:
10.1111/j.1528-1157.1999.tb02019.x
复制
发表时间:
1999-10-01
期刊:
影响因子:
5.6
通讯作者:
Duffell, WH
Duffell, WH
中科院分区:
医学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Asconapé, JJ;Moore, DD;Duffell, WH

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

目的:一位56岁的男性,患有轻度精神发育迟滞、右侧先天性轻偏瘫和难治性部分性癫痫发作,被转诊接受迷走神经刺激(VNS)。外科手术期间的常规电极导线诊断测试(1.0 mA,20 Hz和500 μ s,持续类似于17 s)导致,在最初的两次刺激期间,第三次尝试导致短暂的心搏停止,需要阿托品和简短的心肺复苏术。结果:手术立即终止,设备取出,病人完全康复。术后的心脏评估,包括心电图,24小时霍尔特心电图,超声心动图,和倾斜试验,是normal.Conclusions:心动过缓/心搏停止的可能机制包括刺激颈迷走神经的心脏分支,无论是通过侧支电流传播或直接无意中放置的电极在这些分支之一;电极插入脉冲发生器不当,导致刺激强度不稳定变化;极性相反;以及过敏个体的特异性反应。制造商报告称,类似于3,500个植入物,该术中事件的发生率约为1/875或0.1%。
Purposes: A 56-year-old man with mild mental retardation, right congenital hemiparesis, and refractory partial seizures was referred for vagus nerve stimulation (VNS).Methods: Routine lead diagnostic testing during the surgical procedure (1.0 mA, 20 Hz, and 500 mu s, for similar to 17 s) resulted, during the initial two stimulations, in a bradycardia of similar to 30 beats/min. A third attempt led to transient asystole that required atropine and brief cardiopulmonary resuscitation.Results: The procedure was immediately terminated, the device removed, and the patient recovered completely. A postoperative cardiologic evaluation, including an ECG, 24-h Holter monitor, echocardiogram, and a tilt-table test, was normal.Conclusions: Possible mechanisms for the bradycardia/asystole include stimulation of cervical cardiac branches of the vagus nerve either by collateral cur rent spread or directly by inadvertent placement of the electrodes on one of these branches; improper plugging of the electrodes into the pulse generator, resulting in erratic varying intensity of stimulation; reverse polarity; and idiosyncratic-type reaction in a hypersusceptible individual. The manufacturer reports the occurrence rate in similar to 3,500 implants for this intraoperative event to be approximately one in 875 cases or 0.1%.