Implications of recent findings for current cognitive models of familiar people recognition
Implications of recent findings for current cognitive models of familiar people recognition
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.09.002
复制
发表时间：
2015-10-01
期刊：
影响因子：
2.6
通讯作者：
Gainotti, Guido
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Gainotti, Guido
本调查的目的是回顾临床和实验数据的视觉（脸），听觉（声音）和口头（名称）通过熟悉的人被识别的渠道，通过对比这些数据与模块化认知模型的假设熟悉的人识别。特别注意的事实是，视觉（脸），听觉（声音）和口头（名称）的识别方式有不同的半球表示，这些不对称性有重要的影响，认知模型没有考虑半球的差异作为一个重要的变量在熟悉的人识别。事实上，几项研究表明，熟悉的面孔和声音主要由右半球支持，而名字主要由左半球包含。此外，解剖学临床数据表明，熟悉的判断是不是在人的身份节点（PIN）的水平上产生的，如有影响力的认知模型所建议的，但在特定于模态的识别单元的水平上，右半球的优势，在面部和声音熟悉的感觉的产生。此外，临床和实验数据表明，PIN不应被视为单一语义系统的简单门户，单一语义系统以抽象和非模态格式存储有关人的信息，而是作为涉及个人特定信息存储和检索的结构，优选地在右半球以感觉运动格式表示，在左半球以语言介导格式表示。最后，临床和实验数据表明，在人的身份节点（PIN）的水平的交叉通信之间存在的感知通道有关的面孔和声音，但不是后者和个人的名字。这些数据表明，人的特定表征主要是基于知觉（面孔和声音）的信息在右半球和言语信息在左半球。(C)2015爱思唯尔有限公司版权所有。
The aim of the present survey was to review clinical and experimental data concerning the visual (face), auditory (voice) and verbal (name) channels through which familiar people are recognized, by contrasting these data with assumptions made by modular cognitive models of familiar people recognition. Particular attention was paid to the fact that visual (face), auditory (voice) and verbal (name) recognition modalities have different hemispheric representations and that these asymmetries have important implications for cognitive models which have not considered hemispheric differences as an important variable in familiar people recognition. Several lines of research have, indeed, shown that familiar faces and voices are mainly underpinned by the right hemisphere, whereas names are mostly subsumed by the left hemisphere. Furthermore, anatomoclinical data have shown that familiarity judgements are not generated at the level of the Person Identity Nodes (PINs), as suggested by influential cognitive models, but at the level of the modality-specific recognition units, with a right hemisphere dominance in the generation of face and voice familiarity feelings. Additionally, clinical and experimental data have shown that PINs should not be considered as a simple gateway to a unitary semantic system, which stores information about people in an abstract and amodal format but as structures involved in the storage and retrieval of person-specific information, preferentially represented in a sensory-motor format in the right hemisphere and in a language-mediated format in the left hemisphere. Finally, clinical and experimental data have shown that before the level of the person identity nodes (PINs) a cross-communication exists between the perceptual channels concerning faces and voices, but not between the latter and personal names. These data show that person-specific representations are mainly based on perceptual (face and voice) information in the right hemisphere and on verbal information in the left hemisphere. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.