0-Borel Fixed Ideals
0-Borel Fixed Ideals
复制标题
0-Borel 固定理想
DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
1996
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
I. Peeva
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
I. Peeva
An ideal is called Borel fixed if it is invariant under the action of the Borel group. The interest in studying 0-Borel fixed ideals comes from a theorem of Bayer, Galligo, and Stillman (cf. [Ei,(15.20)]), which shows that the generic initial ideal of any homogeneous ideal in S is Borel-fixed, and further if the characteristic of k is 0 then every Borel-fixed ideal is 0-Borel fixed. When char k 6= 0 there are examples of Borel-fixed ideals which are not 0-Borel fixed. 0-Borel fixed ideals were studied by Eliahou and Kervaire, who described in [EK] the minimal free resolution of S/I. The existence of a commutative associative DG (= differential graded) algebra structure on a minimal free resolution over a graded or local Noetherian ring is a powerful tool for investigating the properties of the resolution. The best example is the Koszul resolution of S/(y1, . . . , yi) for an S-regular sequence y1, . . . , yi. Results of Tate and Gulliksen provide another important example: the minimal resolution of k over S/Q, for any homogeneous ideal Q in S. In both cases the resolution is a free commutative divided power algebra. In general a commutative associative DG algebra structure might be much more complicated or might not exist at all. The latter happens even for finite resolutions as shown in [Av]. However, results of Avramov, Buchsbaum, Gover, Eisenbud, Kustin, Miller, Palmer, and Srinivasan build such a structure in many interesting cases. We extend [Sr,(3.6)], which shows that such a structure exists on the minimal free resolution of S/Q when Q is a power of the maximal ideal (x1, . . . , xr). The main difference between the resolutions of a 0-Borel fixed ideal and of a power of the maximal ideal is that the resolution of a power of the maximal ideal is linear, whereas the resolution of a 0-Borel fixed ideal is linear only if all the minimal generators of the ideal have the same degree. We prove the following: