England and Wales: Empirical Findings
England and Wales: Empirical Findings
复制标题
英格兰和威尔士：实证结果
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2016
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
J. Hodgson
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Vicky Kemp;J. Hodgson
这本书是在研究项目“在审讯中保护年轻嫌疑人”的背景下出版的两卷书中的第二卷。这项由欧盟资助的研究项目源于一项观察，即对审讯期间向少年嫌疑人提供的程序性保护的现有水平了解有限。该研究项目旨在通过更多地了解在五个具有不同少年司法制度的欧盟成员国（比利时、英格兰和威尔士、意大利、波兰和荷兰）中少年在审讯期间的现有程序性权利，至少部分地填补这一空白。在这样做时，它打算确定法律和经验模式，以改进对少年嫌疑犯的有效保护。该项目是马斯特里赫特大学、华威大学、安特卫普大学、雅盖隆大学和马切拉塔大学与儿童防卫和林堡计划合作共同努力的结果。该项目的第一部分成果——对五个选定成员国审问青少年嫌疑人时现有法律程序保障的法律和比较研究——已在单独的一卷中发表（M. Panzavolta、D. de Vocht、M. van Oosterhout和M. Vanderhallen，《审问年轻嫌疑人：法律视角下的程序保障》，剑桥：Intersentia 2015）。这第二卷反映了研究项目的第二和第三部分的结果。第一，它载有在五个会员国进行的实证研究的结果，包括焦点小组访谈和对审讯记录的观察。在单独的章节中讨论了每个会员国的经验调查结果，以深入说明每个管辖范围内的看法和做法。其次，在国别报告之后进行综合分析，将法律和实证调查结果合并，提供比较概览，并将国家调查结果结合为综合观点。最后，这本书包含了一套指导方针——一个最低限度规则的框架——是根据研究项目的发现制定的。该指南及其附加解释性说明包括关于良好做法的建议，旨在激励在整个欧盟范围内促进少年嫌疑人审讯方面的良好做法。
This book is the second of two volumes published in the context of the research project ‘Protecting Young Suspects in Interrogations’. This EU-funded research project sprung from the observation that knowledge of the existing level of procedural protection offered to juvenile suspects during interrogation is limited. The research project aimed to fill at least part of this gap by shedding more light on the existing procedural rights for juveniles during interrogations in five EU Member States with different systems of juvenile justice (Belgium, England and Wales, Italy, Poland and the Netherlands). In doing so, it intended to identify legal and empirical patterns to improve the effective protection of the juvenile suspect. The project has been a joint effort of Maastricht University, Warwick University, Antwerp University, Jagiellonian University and Macerata University in cooperation with Defence for Children and PLOT Limburg. The results of the first part of the project – a legal and comparative study into existing legal procedural safeguards for juvenile suspects during interrogation in the five selected Member States – have been published in a separate volume (M. Panzavolta, D. de Vocht, M. van Oosterhout and M. Vanderhallen, Interrogating Young Suspects: Procedural Safeguards from a Legal Perspective, Cambridge: Intersentia 2015). This second volume reflects the results of the second and third part of the research project. First, it contains the results of the empirical research conducted in the five Member States consisting of focus group interviews and observations of recorded interrogations. The empirical findings of each Member State are discussed in separate chapters to provide an in-depth account of perceptions and practices in the context of each jurisdiction. Second, the country reports are followed by an integrated analysis resulting from the merging of the legal and empirical findings offering a comparative overview and combining the national findings into an integrated perspective. Finally, the book contains a set of guidelines – a framework of minimum rules – developed on the basis of the research project’s findings. The guidelines and their additional explanatory remarks include recommendations for good practices and are intended to serve as an inspiration for promoting good practice in the context of juvenile suspect interrogations throughout the EU.