Rifaximin-α in alcohol-associated liver disease.
Rifaximin-α in alcohol-associated liver disease.
复制标题
利福昔明-α 治疗酒精相关性肝病。
DOI:
10.1016/s2468-1253(23)00033-x
复制
发表时间:
2023
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Singal,AshwaniK
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Xie,Chencheng;Singal,AshwaniK
Comment496 www. thelancet. com/gastrohep Vol 8 June 2023 alcohol-associated liver disease. The authors conclude that rifaximin-α did not reverse liver fibrosis but seemed efficacious in preventing fibrosis progression. Rifaximin-α was well tolerated in this study. 5 This is the first study showing benefits of rifaximin-α in preventing progression of hepatic fibrosis. The results remained unchanged after excluding alcohol drinkers with obesity, which is relevant given that non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) shares disease pathways and histological features with alcohol-associated liver disease. Furthermore, data in mouse models of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease show that rifaximin-α improves dysbiosis, and reduces intestinal permeability and hepatic inflammation. 6, 7 However, Israelsen and colleagues did not examine benefits of rifaximin-α on clinical outcomes, evidence for which remains conflicting. In a randomised controlled study of 32 patients with alcohol-related hepatitis, rifaximin-α did not improve patient survival at 28 days or 90 days, and did not change metabolism or inflammation. 8 In another multicentre, open-label, comparative study (RIFA-AH) in 63 patients with alcoholrelated hepatitis, rifaximin-α use in 21 patients versus standard of care in 42 patients reduced per-patient infections (0· 29 vs 0· 62 infections per patient; p= 0· 049) and acute and chronic liver failure (0· 62 vs 1· 26 episodes per patient; p= 0· 01), with a numerically reduced patient mortality (14· 2% vs30· 9%; p= 0· 15). 9 The study by Israelsen and colleagues had other limitations, such as the inclusion of patients with a broad fibrosis spectrum (F0–F4), which prevented analysis of fibrosis regression in patients with no fibrosis and fibrosis progression in patients with cirrhosis; absence of evaluation of pericellular fibrosis, an important histological finding in patients with alcoholassociated liver disease; and an absence of mechanistic correlation with non-invasive serum biomarkers (bacterial DNA, cytokines, and lipopolysaccharide, and macrophage phenotype). Moreover, alcohol use monitored by phosphatidylethanol measurement, although similar among fibrosis progressors and nonprogressors in rifaximin and placebo groups, was done only at baseline, 1 month, and 18 months, limiting the granular assessment of the effect of rifaximin on fibrosis independent of ongoing alcohol use. Despite limitations, the findings in this study are relevant to clinicians because alcohol-associated liver disease is the most common cause of cirrhosis, a condition in which rifaximin-α is commonly used for hepatic encephalopathy. Future multicentre studies with study designs that overcome the limitations of this study are needed to examine the benefits of rifaximin-α in clinically relevant outcomes in patients with early alcohol-associated liver disease with minimal or no fibrosis to assess its effect in the prevention of cirrhosis and advanced fibrosis. Future studies should also examine the use of rifaximin-α in patients with advanced alcoholassociated liver fibrosis with cirrhosis and alcohol-related hepatitis to assess its impact in improving liver transplantfree patient survival and regression of fibrosis. The study by Israelsen and colleagues provides important data suggesting rifaximin-α as a potential therapeutic to prevent fibrosis progression in patients with alcohol-associated liver disease. Furthermore, the availability and safety profile of rifaximin-α could bolster the armamentarium of pharmacotherapies in this