Test-Retest Effect on Personality Questionnaires

Test-Retest Effect on Personality Questionnaires
复制标题

重测对人格问卷的影响

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
1954
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
C. Windle
C. Windle
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
C. Windle

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

在临床实践和研究中,各种类型的人格问卷越来越多地被用作客观的调整措施。客观调整措施的一个用途是评估治疗效果。这种评估研究可以通过两种基本方式进行设计:(a)比较治疗后接受治疗的病例的调整水平和从同一人群中随机抽取的未接受治疗的病例对照组的调整水平,或(B)比较治疗前后接受治疗的病例的调整水平。第一种设计需要两个随机样本的病人,其中只有一个是要给予治疗,一个条件很难满足在临床实践中。此外,总是存在很大程度的个体间方差,这将增加拒绝零假设的难度。另一方面,治疗前后比较在管理上更容易进行,并且如果每个受试者的治疗前评分可以被认为是其治疗后评分的对照,则涉及较少的个体间方差。然而,这个显然更可取的检验还有其他困难--
PERSONALITY questionnaires of all types are being used with increasing frequency as objective measures of adjustment both in clinical practice and in research. One use to which objective measures of adjustment are put is the assessment of the effects of therapy. Such assessment studies can be designed in two basic ways: (a) comparison between the adjustment levels of therapy-treated cases after therapy and of a control group of non-treated cases drawn randomly from the same population, or (b) comparison between the adjustment levels of therapy-treated cases before and after therapy. The first design requires two random samples of patients, only one of which is to be given therapy, a condition hard to meet in clinical practice. Further, there always exists a large degree of inter-individual variance which will act to increase the difficulty of rejecting the null hypothesis. The before-after therapy comparison, on the other hand, is administratively easier to perform, and involves less interindividual variance if each subject’s pre-therapy score can be considered a control for his post-therapy score. There are other difficulties, however, to this apparently preferable test-