Intersectionality Policymaking Toolkit: Key Principles for an Intersectionality-Informed Policymaking Process to Serve Diverse Women, Children, and Families.
Intersectionality Policymaking Toolkit: Key Principles for an Intersectionality-Informed Policymaking Process to Serve Diverse Women, Children, and Families.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1177/15248399231160447
复制
发表时间：
2023-07
影响因子：
1.9
通讯作者：
Bowleg, Lisa
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Hull, Shawnika J. J.;Massie, Jenne S.;Holt, Sidney L. L.;Bowleg, Lisa
关键词：
美国少数民族妇女和儿童的健康和经济不平等令人震惊。这些不平等现象突出表明，迫切需要为美国妇女和儿童制定跨部门的、面向社会正义的妇幼政策和方案。作为回应，我们开发了“交叉性决策工具包：为不同妇女、儿童和家庭服务的交叉性知情决策过程的关键原则”，以协助美国决策者/助手、从业人员和其他利益攸关方制定更公平的妇幼保健政策/方案。本文介绍了工具包的开发过程和初步评估的可接受性和可行性，用于妇幼保健决策。在2018-2021年期间，我们利用世界卫生组织（WHO）用于制定其WHO手术安全清单的流程来制定内容（例如，案例研究）和格式（即，结构），做出战略决策（例如，核心项目、主要受众、使用时间）、测试概念并接收反馈。我们召开了一次为期两天的规划会议，与会者包括交叉性、决策和妇幼保健方面的专家（8人），以起草工具包。接下来，我们在华盛顿、路易斯安那州新奥尔良和新墨西哥州圣达菲召开了为期半天的研讨会，与政策制定者、项目领导和工作人员一起完善工具包（N=37）。然后，我们通过调查（N = 21）和焦点小组（N = 7）对工具包的可接受性和可行性进行了初步评估。由此产生的工具包提取关键种族理论和交叉性的最关键的元素到一个用户友好的模式，以促进和加强公平的妇幼保健政策和方案，为不同的美国妇女和家庭。
Health and economic inequities among U.S. racial/ethnic minority women and children are staggering. These inequities underscore a dire need for intersectionality-informed, social-justice-oriented maternal and child (MCH) policies and programs for U.S. women and children. In response, we developed the “Intersectionality Policymaking Toolkit: Key Principles for an Intersectionality Informed Policymaking Process to Serve Diverse Women, Children and Families,” to assist U.S. policymakers/aides, practitioners, and other stakeholders in developing more equitable MCH policies/programs. This article describes the Toolkit development process and initial assessments of acceptability and feasibility for use in MCH policymaking. Between 2018-2021, we utilized the process that the World Health Organization (WHO) used to develop its WHO Surgical Safety Checklist to develop the content (e.g., case studies) and format (i.e., structure), make strategic decisions (e.g., core items, primary audiences, timing of utilization), test concepts and receive feedback. We convened a 2- day planning meeting with experts (N = 8) in intersectionality, policymaking and MCH to draft the Toolkit. Next, we convened half-day workshops with policymaking and program leadership and staff in Washington, DC, New Orleans, LA and Santa Fe, NM to refine the Toolkit (N=37). Then we conducted an initial assessment of the Toolkits’ acceptability and feasibility using surveys (N = 21), followed by focus groups (N = 7). The resulting Toolkit distills Critical Race Theory’s and intersectionality’s most critical elements into a user-friendly modality to promote and enhance equitable MCH policies and programs for diverse U.S. women and families.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
3.4
作者：
Bassel, Leah;Emejulu, Akwugo
通讯作者：
Emejulu, Akwugo
DOI：
10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112142
发表时间：
2015-01-01
期刊：
ANNUAL REVIEW OF SOCIOLOGY, VOL 41
影响因子：
--
作者：
Collins, Patricia Hill
通讯作者：
Collins, Patricia Hill
影响因子：
0.6
作者：
Declercq, Eugene;Sakala, Carol;Herrlich, Ariel
通讯作者：
Herrlich, Ariel
影响因子：
2.5
作者：
Damaske S;Bratter JL;Frech A
通讯作者：
Frech A
影响因子：
33.9
作者：
Beauregard, Jennifer L.;Hamner, Heather C.;Perrine, Cria G.
通讯作者：
Perrine, Cria G.