Evaluating one- and two-source energy balance models in estimating surface evapotranspiration from Landsat-derived surface temperature and field measurements
Evaluating one- and two-source energy balance models in estimating surface evapotranspiration from Landsat-derived surface temperature and field measurements
复制标题
评估一源和二源能量平衡模型，通过 Landsat 得出的表面温度和现场测量来估算地表蒸散量
DOI：
10.1080/01431161.2012.716529
复制
发表时间：
2013-05
影响因子：
3.4
通讯作者：
Zhao-Liang Li
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Jinyong Lou;Yuanyuan Jia;Chuanrong Li;Ronglin Tang;Kun-Shan Chen;Xiaomin Sun;Zhao-Liang Li
本文比较了单源和双源能量平衡模式(OSEB和TSEB)在估算地表能量组分中的应用，并利用陆地卫星图像和中国北部禹城站的地面测量数据进行了对比。与地面测量相比，在估算地表净辐射和土壤热通量方面，TSEB和OSEB模型的表现相似。TSEB和OSEB模式的均方根差均在14-39 W m−2之间。在用TSEB和OSEB模式估算的感热(H)和潜热(LE)通量与涡动协方差(EC)系统测量的比较中，剩余能量(E-R)校正方法得到了最好的一致性。TSEB模型在再现表面H和LE测量方面明显优于OSEB模型。从增强型专题测绘仪(ETM+)传感器中提取的地表温度低于2009年178天和218天的气温(DOY)，这很可能是卷云造成的。这种大气稳定性与EC测量观测到的不稳定大气相反。如果剔除这两天的数据，并应用E-R校正方法，当将估计的H和LE与EC测量进行比较时，TSEB模式的RMSD在55W m−2以内，而在OSEB模式中，RMSD大于97W m−2。
This article compares one- and two-source energy balance (OSEB and TSEB) models in the estimates of surface energy components using Landsat imagery and surface measurements acquired from an experimental field at Yucheng Station in Northern China. Compared to surface measurements, similar performance between the TSEB and OSEB models has been observed for estimated surface net radiation and soil heat flux. The root mean square difference (RMSD) is within 14–39 W m−2 in both the TSEB and OSEB models. The residual energy (E R) correction method yields the best agreement in comparisons of the sensible (H) and latent (LE) heat fluxes estimated using both the TSEB and OSEB models to the eddy covariance (EC) system measurements. The TSEB model is shown to greatly outperform the OSEB model in reproducing surface H and LE measurements. Cirrus clouds are likely responsible for the surface temperature retrieved from the enhanced thematic mapper plus (ETM+) sensor being lower than air temperature on days of the year (DOYs) 178 and 218 of 2009. This atmospheric stability is contrary to the unstable atmosphere that the EC measurements observe. If data on these two days are excluded and the E R correction method is applied, when comparing the estimated H and LE to the EC measurements, RMSD is within 55 W m−2 in the TSEB model and is larger than 97 W m−2 in the OSEB model.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
2.4
作者：
M. Moran;Ray D. Jackson
通讯作者：
M. Moran;Ray D. Jackson
DOI：
10.1016/s1464-1909(99)00128-8
发表时间：
2000-01-01
期刊：
PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY OF THE EARTH PART B-HYDROLOGY OCEANS AND ATMOSPHERE
影响因子：
--
作者：
Roerink, GJ;Su, Z;Menenti, M
通讯作者：
Menenti, M
DOI：
10.1016/b978-0-12-024302-0.50017-5
发表时间：
1983
期刊：
--
影响因子：
--
作者：
J. Hatfield
通讯作者：
J. Hatfield
影响因子：
13.5
作者：
Fuqin Li;W. Kustas;Martha C. Anderson;J. Prueger;R. Scott
通讯作者：
Fuqin Li;W. Kustas;Martha C. Anderson;J. Prueger;R. Scott
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2007
期刊：
--
影响因子：
--
作者：
M. Mementi;B. Choudhury
通讯作者：
M. Mementi;B. Choudhury