Analysis of scientific collaboration in Chinese psychiatry research.

Analysis of scientific collaboration in Chinese psychiatry research.
复制标题

中国精神病学研究的科学合作分析

DOI:
10.1186/s12888-016-0870-1
复制
发表时间:
2016-05-26
期刊:
影响因子:
4.4
通讯作者:
Jin X
Jin X
中科院分区:
医学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Wu Y;Jin X

文献摘要

相似文献

近几十年来,中国发生了深刻变化,成为世界第二大经济体。随着经济的快速发展和社会压力的增加,中国患有精神障碍的人口比例也在增加。本研究的目的是阐明中国精神病学领域的合作状况,目前这方面的研究有限。我们从中国知网(CNKI)和万方数据库的10种核心精神病学期刊中抽取了16,224篇出版物(2003-2012)。我们使用了各种社会网络分析(SNA)方法,如中心性分析和核心竞争力分析来研究协作。在本研究中,我们还使用了层次聚类分析。从2003年到2012年,中国精神病学领域在作者、机构和地区层面的合作不断增加。从地理上看,这些合作分布不均。以100位最多产的作者和机构以及32个地区为基础构建合作地图,从中找出核心作者、机构和地区。合作行为受经济发展的影响。我们应该鼓励中国精神病学领域的合作行为,因为这有助于知识分配,资源共享和信息获取。合作还帮助该领域缩小了目前的研究重点,为决策者提供了进一步的证据,以资助研究,以解决现代中国面临的精神障碍的增加。
In recent decades, China has changed profoundly, becoming the country with the world’s second-largest economy. The proportion of the Chinese population suffering from mental disorder has grown in parallel with the rapid economic development, as social stresses have increased. The aim of this study is to shed light on the status of collaborations in the Chinese psychiatry field, of which there is currently limited research. We sampled 16,224 publications (2003-2012) from 10 core psychiatry journals from Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and WanFang Database. We used various social network analysis (SNA) methods such as centrality analysis, and Core-Periphery analysis to study collaboration. We also used hierarchical clustering analysis in this study. From 2003-2012, there were increasing collaborations at the level of authors, institutions and regions in the Chinese psychiatry field. Geographically, these collaborations were distributed unevenly. The 100 most prolific authors and institutions and 32 regions were used to construct the collaboration map, from which we detected the core author, institution and region. Collaborative behavior was affected by economic development. We should encourage collaborative behavior in the Chinese psychiatry field, as this facilitates knowledge distribution, resource sharing and information acquisition. Collaboration has also helped the field narrow its current research focus, providing further evidence to inform policymakers to fund research in order to tackle the increase in mental disorder facing modern China.