Risk target: An interactive context factor in risk perception
Risk target: An interactive context factor in risk perception
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/1539-6924.00359
复制
发表时间：
2003-08-01
期刊：
影响因子：
3.8
通讯作者：
Mullet, E
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Hermand, D;Karsenty, S;Mullet, E
检查了目标规范对风险评估的影响。考虑了涵盖大部分领域的一整套危害：常见的个人危害、户外活动、医疗保健、公共交通、能源生产、污染物、性、越轨行为和成瘾。引入了三个人类目标：个人健康风险（包括个人死亡风险）、国内人民的健康风险和世界人民的健康风险。基本设计是科目间设计。第一个假设是，在“世界”条件下做出的风险判断应该高于在“国家”条件下做出的风险判断，并且在此条件下做出的风险判断应高于在“个人”条件下做出的风险判断。宜必思就是所观察到的。第二个假设是，目标效应应该根据所考虑的危险类型而有所不同。这也是观察到的情况。在两个领域——污染物、越轨行为、性和成瘾——目标效应很重要。它相当于响应规模的大约十分之一。在其余四个领域中，目标效应不重要或不存在。
The effect of specification of the target on risk evaluation was examined. A whole set of hazards, covering most of the domains, were considered: common individual hazards, outdoor activities, medical care, public transportation, energy production, pollutants, sex, deviance, and addictions. Three human targets were introduced: personal health risk (including personal risk of death), health risk for people in the country, and health risk for people in the world. The basic design was a between-subjects design. The first hypothesis was that risk judgments made in the "world" condition should be higher than risk judgments made in the "country" condition, and risk judgments made in this condition should be higher than risk judgments made in the "personal" condition. Ibis is what was observed. The second hypothesis was that the target effect should differ as a function of the kind of hazards considered. This also is what was observed. In two domains-pollutants, and deviance, sex, and addictions-the target effect was important. It corresponded to about one-tenth of the response scale. In the four remaining domains, the target effect was unimportant or absent.