Measuring vaccine hesitancy: The development of a survey tool
Measuring vaccine hesitancy: The development of a survey tool
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.04.037
复制
发表时间：
2015-08-14
期刊：
影响因子：
5.5
通讯作者：
Wilson, Rose
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Larson, Heidi J.;Jarrett, Caitlin;Wilson, Rose
2012年3月，SAGE疫苗犹豫问题工作组召开会议，以确定“疫苗犹豫”一词的定义，并绘制疫苗犹豫的决定因素图，并开发工具，以衡量和解决犹豫不决的性质和规模，在这种情况变得越来越明显。疫苗犹豫的定义和决定因素矩阵指导了一项调查工具的开发，以评估犹豫问题的性质和规模。此外，在由全球国家免疫管理人员填写的世卫组织-儿童基金会年度联合报告表中试点了疫苗犹豫问题。描述疫苗犹豫问题的性质和规模的目的是更好地为制定适当的战略和政策提供信息，以解决所表达的关切，并维持对疫苗接种的信心。工作组根据对同行评议文献和灰色文献的系统审查以及工作组的专门知识，制定了疫苗犹豫决定因素矩阵。该矩阵将影响决定接受、推迟或拒绝部分或全部疫苗的关键因素分为三类：环境、个人和群体以及疫苗特异性。这些类别构成了本文提出的调查问题菜单，以帮助诊断和解决疫苗犹豫问题。(C) 2015年Elsevier Ltd.出版这是一篇基于CC BY许可的开放获取文章。
In March 2012, the SAGE Working Group on Vaccine Hesitancy was convened to define the term "vaccine hesitancy", as well as to map the determinants of vaccine hesitancy and develop tools to measure and address the nature and scale of hesitancy in settings where it is becoming more evident.The definition of vaccine hesitancy and a matrix of determinants guided the development of a survey tool to assess the nature and scale of hesitancy issues. Additionally, vaccine hesitancy questions were piloted in the annual WHO-UNICEF joint reporting form, completed by National Immunization Managers globally. The objective of characterizing the nature and scale of vaccine hesitancy issues is to better inform the development of appropriate strategies and policies to address the concerns expressed, and to sustain confidence in vaccination.The Working Group developed a matrix of the determinants of vaccine hesitancy informed by a systematic review of peer reviewed and grey literature, and by the expertise of the working group. The matrix mapped the key factors influencing the decision to accept, delay or reject some or all vaccines under three categories: contextual, individual and group, and vaccine-specific. These categories framed the menu of survey questions presented in this paper to help diagnose and address vaccine hesitancy. (C) 2015 Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license.