Phosphoproteomics and bioinformatics analyses of spinal cord proteins in rats with morphine tolerance.
Phosphoproteomics and bioinformatics analyses of spinal cord proteins in rats with morphine tolerance.
复制标题
具有吗啡耐受性大鼠的脊髓蛋白的磷酸蛋白质组学和生物信息学分析。
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0083817
复制
发表时间:
2014
期刊:
影响因子:
3.7
通讯作者:
Shui HA
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Liaw WJ;Tsao CM;Huang GS;Wu CC;Ho ST;Wang JJ;Tao YX;Shui HA
Morphine is the most effective pain-relieving drug, but it can cause unwanted side effects. Direct neuraxial administration of morphine to spinal cord not only can provide effective, reliable pain relief but also can prevent the development of supraspinal side effects. However, repeated neuraxial administration of morphine may still lead to morphine tolerance. To better understand the mechanism that causes morphine tolerance, we induced tolerance in rats at the spinal cord level by giving them twice-daily injections of morphine (20 µg/10 µL) for 4 days. We confirmed tolerance by measuring paw withdrawal latencies and maximal possible analgesic effect of morphine on day 5. We then carried out phosphoproteomic analysis to investigate the global phosphorylation of spinal proteins associated with morphine tolerance. Finally, pull-down assays were used to identify phosphorylated types and sites of 14-3-3 proteins, and bioinformatics was applied to predict biological networks impacted by the morphine-regulated proteins. Our proteomics data showed that repeated morphine treatment altered phosphorylation of 10 proteins in the spinal cord. Pull-down assays identified 2 serine/threonine phosphorylated sites in 14-3-3 proteins. Bioinformatics further revealed that morphine impacted on cytoskeletal reorganization, neuroplasticity, protein folding and modulation, signal transduction and biomolecular metabolism. Repeated morphine administration may affect multiple biological networks by altering protein phosphorylation. These data may provide insight into the mechanism that underlies the development of morphine tolerance.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
14.9
作者:
Jensen LJ;Kuhn M;Stark M;Chaffron S;Creevey C;Muller J;Doerks T;Julien P;Roth A;Simonovic M;Bork P;von Mering C
通讯作者:
von Mering C
影响因子:
5.3
作者:
Dobashi T;Tanabe S;Jin H;Mimura N;Yamamoto T;Nishino T;Aoe T
通讯作者:
Aoe T
影响因子:
2.5
作者:
Alonso, Elba;Garrido, Elisa;Alguacil, Luis F.
通讯作者:
Alguacil, Luis F.
DOI:
10.1016/s1521-6896(03)00014-4
发表时间:
2003-09-01
期刊:
Best practice & research. Clinical anaesthesiology
影响因子:
--
作者:
Gerber, Helmut R
通讯作者:
Gerber, Helmut R
影响因子:
7
作者:
Larsen, MR;Thingholm, TE;Jorgensen, TJD
通讯作者:
Jorgensen, TJD