From Nano to Macro: Thinking Bigger in Nanoparticle Assembly
From Nano to Macro: Thinking Bigger in Nanoparticle Assembly
复制标题
从纳米到宏观:纳米粒子组装的更大思考
DOI:
10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c02724
复制
发表时间:
2021
期刊:
影响因子:
10.8
通讯作者:
Macfarlane, Robert J.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Macfarlane, Robert J.
In the past few decades, nanoparticle (NP) self-assembly has advanced to the point that NP superlattice crystallization can be envisioned as a viable method for the fabrication of functional devices and technologies. 1− 3 As with any new material whose synthetic methods are sufficiently developed, multiple questions now arise that must be addressed to progress the field. The two questions for the next phase in NP assembly research most commonly found in the current literature (either implicitly or explicitly) could arguably be stated as “What new properties do these materials have?” and “What are these superlattices good for?”. 4− 6 Certainly, these are critical questions to transition NP superlattices from benchtop curiosities to useful materials. However, we run the risk of falling victim to a key blind spot in the standard materials development paradigm if we assume that the identification of properties and applications for these superlattices is the only hurdle remaining in their development. Specifically, advancing a material from its initial synthesis or discovery to its use in a functional application requires us to also answer the question of “How do we process these materials into a useful form?”. 7, 8 Future research efforts with NP-based materials are going to rely on the ability to produce them in the right geometric configuration, as structure control beyond just nanoscale ordering is important in enabling both fundamental investigations of structure− property relationships and application in useful devices. Ultimately, the amount of impact NP superlattices will have in advancing both science and engineering depends on how well we can control their hierarchical structures beyond just their initial assembly. Macroscopic structure control (eg, mm-scale or larger) has obvious implications for the utility of NP superlattices, as the final form factor of the device or technological component dictates both how much material is needed and what its overall shape needs to be. Processing the superlattices in a manner that does not disrupt all of the hard work spent making beautiful crystalline geometries is not necessarily a simple task, though, as most common material processing techniques designed for atomic, molecular, and macromolecular systems are not always compatible with the typically mild conditions used to form wellordered NP arrays. Nominally 2D films and coatings from particle assembly can already be developed on the centimeterscale or potentially larger, 5, 9− 13 but truly 3D macroscopic objects made via NP self-assembly that preserve nanoscale ordering are more rare. 14− 17 Moreover, even in assembly methods capable of generating objects with at least some macroscopic dimension, manipulation of material microstructure is still underdeveloped. Microstructural features are key design factors used to control the characteristics and behavior of bulk atomic or molecular materials including mechanical (hardness, toughness, ductility), chemical (corrosion and etching, transport), and optical (light reflection and scattering) properties. 7, 18 Understanding how factors like defects, grain sizes, or crystal texture in NP superlattices affect their performance is thus another critical area of investigation that is enabled by innovations in processing science. So how do we establish processing methods for these NP superlattices to manipulate both micro-and macroscopic structure (without sacrificing nanoscale organization), and what are the key aspects of our various NP assembly techniques that we need to improve upon to enable such research? One of the obvious criteria for any processable NP superlattice is the ability to produce materials at an appropriate scale …