Comparative Modernization Theory and Glocalization Theory
Comparative Modernization Theory and Glocalization Theory
复制标题
比较现代化理论与全球本土化理论
DOI：
10.4057/jsr.57.125
复制
发表时间：
2006
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Kiyomitsu Yui
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Kiyomitsu Yui
本文试图探讨“理论形成如何可能？”这一问题的共同主题。在比较现代化理论和全球本土化理论的阐述方面进行案例研究。从船桥（1982）和小坂（1998）提出的理论分类的角度出发，我们可以掌握比较现代化理论以及作为其基本原理的功能主义。然而，最近据说这种结合已被破坏（Sato 1998）。 社会学家已经很长时间没有讨论社会学理论基本原理的多重性了。然而，在某种程度上，多样性是该学科的内在组成部分。与此同时，作为一种事实现象，新的、有吸引力的“指导（敏化）思想”（如全球化、风险社会等）也相继被众多社会学家所研究。本文试图通过比较现代化理论与全球本土化理论作为有吸引力的“指导思想”的阐述或结合的实际论述或实践来描述理论形成的过程。以下几点总结了本文的核心结论。 (1) 无论所涉及的基本原则如何，建议假设理论和实证研究之间存在相互运动，并且这些运动涉及螺旋发展。全球本土化理论与比较现代化理论的结合具有重要意义，比较现代化理论是一个基础命题（或中层理论），更具有实证研究的基础。 （2）衔接过程涉及两种理论的内在转型（比较现代化理论和全球本土化理论的重构）。 (3)这种阐述有时可以促进理论传统的重建（在本文中，指的是全球本土化世界中超越公民身份的人权）。
This paper attempts to explore the common theme of the issue “How is theory formation possible?” in terms of the case study of the articulation of comparative modernization theory and glocalization theory. One can grasp comparative modernization theory and, as its fundamental principle, functionalism from the view-point of the theory classification proposed by Funabashi (1982) and Kosaka (1998). Recently, however, it is said that the combination has been destructed (Sato 1998).It has been a long while since sociologists have discussed the multiplicity of the fundamental principles of sociological theory. To a certain extent, however, multiplicity is a built-in component of the discipline. Meanwhile, as a de facto phenomenon, new and attractive “guidance (sensitizing) ideas” (such as globalization, risk society, and so on) have been successively studied by many sociologists. This paper attempts to delineate the process of the theory formation in terms of actual esquisse or exercise in the articulation or combination of comparative modernization theory with glocalization theory as an attractive “guidance idea.” The following points summarize the core conclusions of this paper. (1) Regardless of the fundamental principles involved, it is advisable to suppose the existence of reciprocal movements between theory and empirical research and that these movements involve a helical development. It is significant for glocalization theory to be articulated with comparative modernization theory, which is a foundational proposition (or a middle-range theory) that is considerably more grounded in empirical studies. (2) The articulation process involves the internal transformation of both theories (the reconstruction of both comparative modernization theory and glocalization theory). (3) This articulation can sometimes prompt the reconstruction of theoretical tradition (which, in this paper, refers to human rights that go beyond citizenship in the glocalized world).
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2004
期刊：
HONGOU No.51
影响因子：
--
作者：
SUETAKE;Yoshiya
通讯作者：
Yoshiya