A randomised, controlled trial of the pulmonary artery catheter in critically ill patients

A randomised, controlled trial of the pulmonary artery catheter in critically ill patients
复制标题

DOI:
10.1007/s00134-002-1206-9
复制
发表时间:
2002-03-01
影响因子:
38.9
通讯作者:
Bennett, ED
Bennett, ED
中科院分区:
医学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Rhodes, A;Cusack, RJ;Bennett, ED

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

目的:比较使用肺动脉导管(PAC)与未使用PAC治疗的危重患者的生存率和临床结局。设计:1997年10月至1999年2月的前瞻性、随机、对照临床试验。设置:成人重症监护病房在一家大型教学医院。患者:201例重症患者随机分配至PAC组(n=95)或对照组(n=106)。对照组中有1例患者退出研究,PAC组中有5例患者未接受PAC。所有参与者都可以接受随访。干预措施:参与者被分配到使用PAC(PAC组)或不使用PAC(对照组)进行管理。主要结局指标:在意向治疗的基础上,对成功接受PAC的受试者的28天生存期、重症监护和住院时间以及器官功能障碍进行了比较,并对成功接受PAC的受试者进行了亚组比较。结果如下:PAC组[46/95(47.9%)]和对照组[50/106(47.6)]之间的死亡率无显著差异(差异的95%置信区间为-13至14%,p>0.99)。根据PAC信息进行管理决策的参与者的死亡率为41/91(45%,95%置信区间-11至16%,p=0.77)。PAC组在最初24小时内的液体量明显更多(4953(3140,7000)vs 4292(2535,6049)零),肾衰竭的发生率增加(随机化后第3天35 vs 20%的患者),
Objective: To compare the survival and clinical outcomes of critically ill patients treated with the use of a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) to those treated without the use of a PAC. Design: Prospective, randomised, controlled, clinical trial from October 1997 to February 1999. Setting: Adult intensive care unit at a large teaching hospital. Patients: Two hundred one critically ill patients were randomised either to a PAC group (n=95) or the control group (n=106). One patient in the control group was withdrawn from the study and five patients in the PAC group did not receive a PAC. All participants were available for follow-up. Interventions: Participants were assigned to be managed either with the use of a PAC (PAC a group) or without the use of a PAC (control group). Main outcome measures: Survival to 28 days, intensive care and hospital length of stay and organ dysfunction were compared on an intention-to-treat basis and also on a subgroup basis for those participants who Successfully received a PAC. Results: There was no significant difference in mortality between the PAC group [46/95 (47.9%)] and the control group [50/106 (47.6)] (95% confidence intervals for the difference -13 to 14%, p>0.99). The mortality for participants who had management decisions based on information derived from a PAC was 41/91 (45%, 95% confidence intervals -11 to 16%, p=0.77). The PAC group had significantly more fluids in the first 24 h (4953 (3140, 7000) versus 4292 (2535, 6049) nil) and an increased incidence of renal failure (35 versus 20% of patients at day 3 post randomisation p