Labeling, maximality and the head – phrase distinction
Labeling, maximality and the head – phrase distinction
复制标题
标签、最大化和中心短语区别
DOI：
10.1515/tlr-2015-0016
复制
发表时间：
2016
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
L. Rizzi
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
L. Rizzi
将Chomsky（2013）的标记算法与短语结构相结合，提出了如何区分中心语（简单或复杂）和短语的问题。我提出了一个符号装置，它以一种解决标记算法的技术问题的方式来区分。专注于短语运动，我展示了如何“停顿问题”的wh-movement，特别是冻结的影响，在关键的位置，可以从标签和最大原则，限制运动到最大的元素与给定的标签。然后看头部运动，我认为，它可以与无篡改条件一致，并制定出标记算法的头部运动所产生的结构。最后，我认为，禁止在中心语运动的excorporation可以被分析为冻结的情况下，并追溯到最大原则相对于中心语短语的区别，冻结短语运动。
Abstract Combining the labeling algorithm of Chomsky (2013) with bare phrase structure raises the question of how heads (simple or complex) and phrases can be distinguished. I propose a notational device which draws the distinction in a way which solves technical problems for the labeling algorithm. Focusing on phrasal movement, I show how the “halting problem” for wh-movement, and in particular the freezing effects arising in criterial positions, can be derived from labeling and a maximality principle, restricting movement to maximal elements with a given label. Looking then at head movement, I argue that it can be made consistent with the No Tampering condition, and work out the labeling algorithm for structures derived by head movement. Finally, I argue that the ban against excorporation in head movement can be analyzed as a case of freezing, and traced back, much as freezing in phrasal movement, to the maximality principle relativized to the head – phrase distinction.