Infrastructure hazard resilience trends: an analysis of 25 years of research

Infrastructure hazard resilience trends: an analysis of 25 years of research
复制标题

DOI:
10.1007/s11069-017-2792-8
复制
发表时间:
2017-03
期刊:
影响因子:
3.7
通讯作者:
A. Opdyke;Amy Javernick‐Will;Matthew A. Koschmann
A. Opdyke;Amy Javernick‐Will;Matthew A. Koschmann
中科院分区:
工程技术3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
A. Opdyke;Amy Javernick‐Will;Matthew A. Koschmann

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

过去几十年来,灾害研究取得了重大进展,回答了有关脆弱性和恢复的关键问题。最近,复原力已成为学术辩论和实践者策略的前沿,但在实践中实施复原力仍然存在挑战,这是遍布多个研究领域的复杂研究网络的结果。因此,有必要对复原力文献的现状进行分析和反思。我们回顾了 1990 年至 2015 年 Web of Science and Engineering Village 数据库中的 241 篇期刊文章,分析了研究地理位置、采用的方法、分析单位和研究的复原力维度以及每个类别之间的相关性方面的研究趋势。大多数分析研究是在北美进行的,采用定量方法,重点关注基础设施和社区分析单位,并研究了治理、基础设施和复原力的经济维度。该分析指出需要:(1) 在发展中国家的背景下开展研究,其中复原力尤为重要; (2) 采用混合方法来进一步深入定量研究; (3) 连接分析单元,例如基础设施和社区; (4) 扩大复原力的环境和社会维度的测量和研究。
Hazard research has made significant strides over the last several decades, answering critical questions surrounding vulnerability and recovery. Recently, resilience has come to the forefront of scholarly debates and practitioner strategies, yet there remain challenges implementing resilience in practice, the result of a complex web of research that spread across numerous fields of study. As a result, there is a need to analyze and reflect on the current state of resilience literature. We reviewed 241 journal articles from the Web of Science and Engineering Village databases from 1990 to 2015 to analyze research trends in geographic location of studies, methods employed, units of analysis, and resilience dimensions studied, as well as correlations between each of these categories. The majority of the studies analyzed were conducted in North America, used quantitative methods, focused on infrastructure and community units of analysis, and studied governance, infrastructure, and economic dimensions of resilience. This analysis points to the need to: (1) conduct studies in developing country contexts, where resilience is particularly important; (2) employ mixed-methods for additional depth to quantitative studies; (3) connect units of analysis, such as infrastructure and community; and (4) expand on the measurement and study of environmental and social dimensions of resilience.