Evasion of neutralizing antibody responses by the SARS-CoV-2 BA.2.75 variant.
Evasion of neutralizing antibody responses by the SARS-CoV-2 BA.2.75 variant.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/j.chom.2022.09.015
复制
发表时间:
2022-11-09
影响因子:
30.3
通讯作者:
Liu, Shan-Lu
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Qu, Panke;Evans, John P.;Zheng, Yi-Min;Carlin, Claire;Saif, Linda J.;Oltz, Eugene M.;Xu, Kai;Gumina, Richard J.;Liu, Shan-Lu
The newly emerged BA.2.75 severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variant contains 9 additional mutations in its spike (S) protein compared to the ancestral BA.2 variant. Here, we examine the neutralizing antibody escape of BA.2.75 in mRNA-vaccinated and BA.1-infected individuals, as well as the molecular basis underlying functional changes in S. Notably, BA.2.75 exhibits enhanced neutralization resistance over BA.2 but less than the BA.4/5 variant. The G446S and N460K mutations of BA.2.75 are primarily responsible for its enhanced resistance to neutralizing antibodies. The R493Q mutation, a reversion to the prototype sequence, reduces BA.2.75 neutralization resistance. The impact of these mutations is consistent with their locations in common neutralizing antibody epitopes. Further, BA.2.75 shows enhanced cell-cell fusion over BA.2, driven largely by the N460K mutation, which enhances S processing. Structural modeling reveals enhanced receptor contacts introduced by N460K, suggesting a mechanism of potentiated receptor utilization and syncytia formation. Newly emerged Omicron subvariants reignite concerns over escape from existing immunity. Qu and colleagues compare the immunity resistance and fusogenicity of BA.2.75 with prior variants. BA.2.75 exhibits stronger neutralization resistance than BA.2 but weaker than BA.4/5, as well as enhanced fusogenicity, which are largely driven by G446S and N460K, respectively.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
16.6
作者:
Greaney AJ;Starr TN;Barnes CO;Weisblum Y;Schmidt F;Caskey M;Gaebler C;Cho A;Agudelo M;Finkin S;Wang Z;Poston D;Muecksch F;Hatziioannou T;Bieniasz PD;Robbiani DF;Nussenzweig MC;Bjorkman PJ;Bloom JD
通讯作者:
Bloom JD
影响因子:
64.5
作者:
Li, Linjie;Liao, Hanyi;Meng, Yumin;Li, Weiwei;Han, Pengcheng;Liu, Kefang;Wang, Qing;Li, Dedong;Zhang, Yanfang;Wang, Liang;Fan, Zheng;Zhang, Yuqin;Wang, Qiyue;Zhao, Xin;Sun, Yeping;Huang, Niu;Qi, Jianxun;Gao, George Fu
通讯作者:
Gao, George Fu
影响因子:
64.5
作者:
Hoffmann M;Krüger N;Schulz S;Cossmann A;Rocha C;Kempf A;Nehlmeier I;Graichen L;Moldenhauer AS;Winkler MS;Lier M;Dopfer-Jablonka A;Jäck HM;Behrens GMN;Pöhlmann S
通讯作者:
Pöhlmann S
影响因子:
30.3
作者:
Evans, John P.;Zeng, Cong;Qu, Panke;Faraone, Julia;Zheng, Yi-Min;Carlin, Claire;Bednash, Joseph S.;Zhou, Tongqing;Lozanski, Gerard;Mallampalli, Rama;Saif, Linda J.;Oltz, Eugene M.;Mohler, Peter J.;Xu, Kai;Gumina, Richard J.;Liu, Shan-Lu
通讯作者:
Liu, Shan-Lu
影响因子:
48
作者:
Punjani, Ali;Rubinstein, John L.;Brubaker, Marcus A.
通讯作者:
Brubaker, Marcus A.