What can climate services learn from theory and practice of co-production?
What can climate services learn from theory and practice of co-production?
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.cliser.2018.11.001
复制
发表时间：
2018-12
期刊：
影响因子：
3.2
通讯作者：
K. Vincent;Meaghan Daly;C. Scannell;Bill Leathes
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
K. Vincent;Meaghan Daly;C. Scannell;Bill Leathes
联合制作的气候服务日益被认为是改善气候信息的有效生成和利用的一种手段，以告知决策和支持适应气候变化，特别是在发展中国家。有丰富的文献概述了联合生产的理论和概念演变，以及在不同部门和不同规模的各种决策背景下的经验。然而，气候服务的生产者参与这些文献的程度各不相同。本文回顾了联合制作文献，以反映新出现的兴趣和应用，特别是在发展中国家，并阐述了一些为气候服务提供信息的关键原则。虽然我们的目标既不全面也不规范，但这些原则可以为共同产生的气候服务提供规范和务实的方法。共同制作的气候服务产品应是决策驱动、基于进程和时间管理的。共同提供气候服务的进程应当具有包容性、协作性和灵活性。还举例说明了如何在实践中运用这些原则。对这些新出现的实例进行评估将有助于进一步为气候服务的共同制作提供信息。
Co-produced climate services are increasingly recognised as a means of improving the effective generation and utilisation of climate information to inform decision-making and support adaptation to climate change, particularly in developing countries. There is a rich literature outlining the theoretical and conceptual evolution of co-production, and experiences of it in a variety of decision contexts – in different sectors and at different scales. However, the extent to which the producers of climate services have engaged with this literature varies. Reflecting the emerging interest and application, particularly in developing countries, this paper reviews the co-production literature to distil some key principles to inform climate services. Whilst we aim to be neither comprehensive nor prescriptive, these principles can inform a normative and pragmatic approach to co-produced climate services. A co-produced climate service product should be decision-driven, process-based and time-managed. The process of co-producing a climate service should be inclusive, collaborative and flexible. Illustrations are also provided of how these principles may be engaged in practice. Evaluation of these emerging examples will help further inform co-production of climate services.