Integrating institutional approaches and decision science to address climate change: a multi-level collective action research agenda
Integrating institutional approaches and decision science to address climate change: a multi-level collective action research agenda
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.cosust.2021.06.001
复制
发表时间：
2021-10
影响因子：
7.2
通讯作者：
Abigail M. York;Caitlin Drummond Otten;Shauna Burnsilver;Steven L. Neuberg;J. Anderies
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Abigail M. York;Caitlin Drummond Otten;Shauna Burnsilver;Steven L. Neuberg;J. Anderies
气候变化是一个需要从个人到全球多尺度应对的问题。每一级和每一类实体都有一定的能力影响气候变化行动和政策，但作为一个多层次的集体行动问题，气候变化行动的提供不足并不奇怪;这一挑战突出表明需要更好地了解决策过程。我们提出了一个综合的研究前沿，探讨跨层次的反馈过程，个人和组织在促进信任内和跨层次的作用，建立和沟通规范的重要性，并纳入世界观，以确保决策者在气候变化的叙述。未能减缓和适应气候变化是一个社会科学问题，也许是我们社会面临的最大社会问题。要解决这个问题，我们需要在一系列复杂的多层次集体行动关系中推进决策的新领域。
Climate change is a problem that requires a multi-scale response from the individual to the global. Each level and type of entity has some capacity to influence climate change action and policy, but as a multi-level collective action problem, it is not surprising that there is underprovision of climate change action; this challenge highlights the need to better understand decision-making processes. We propose an integrated research frontier that examines inter-level feedback processes, the role of individuals and organizations in promoting trust within and across levels, the importance of establishing and communicating norms, and inclusion of worldviews to situate decision makers within narratives of climate change. The failure to mitigate and adapt to climate change is a social science problem, perhaps the biggest social problem our society faces. To solve it requires that we advance a new frontier on decision making across a complex set of multi-level collective action relationships.