Lab, Field, Gallery, and Beyond
Lab, Field, Gallery, and Beyond
复制标题
实验室、现场、画廊等
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2008
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Johan Redström
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
I. Koskinen;T. Binder;Johan Redström
在过去的10年里，我们看到越来越多的研究人员在他们的研究中整合了设计实验。最初，这项工作大量借鉴了邻近领域，采用了双重策略，其中设计实验及其评估在很大程度上被视为独立的过程，通常由不同的人进行。最近，设计研究人员开发了几种方法，将特定于设计的工作方法整合到研究中。本文从方法论上考察了作者称之为实验室、现场和画廊的三种已建立的方法。对它们进行了描述，并分析了它们的异同。最后，讨论了今天的设计研究是否需要建立在其他学科标准基础上的基础。
Over the last 10 years we have seen a growing number of researchers integrating design experiments in their research inquiries. Initially, this work borrowed heavily from neighboring fields, employing a dual strategy in which design experiments and their evaluation were largely treated as separate processes that were often carried out by different people. More recently, design researchers have developed several approaches that integrate design-specific work methods into research. This paper takes a methodological look at three such established approaches that the authors call Lab, Field, and Gallery. They are described and their similarities and differences analyzed. In conclusion, whether design research today needs foundations based on the standards established for other disciplines is discussed.