Priority domains, aims, and testable hypotheses for implementation research: Protocol for a scoping review and evidence map.
Priority domains, aims, and testable hypotheses for implementation research: Protocol for a scoping review and evidence map.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1186/s13643-020-01535-y
复制
发表时间：
2020-12-03
影响因子：
3.7
通讯作者：
Kirk MA
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Garner BR;Patel SV;Kirk MA
在实践环境中实施循证创新的挑战是实施研究领域重点解决的一个重大公共卫生问题。迄今为止，已经在IR上投入了大量的资金、时间和精力，但仍有很大的进步空间，特别是在国家科学院定义的科学理论的IR发展方面（即，由大量证据支持的变量之间关系的全面解释）。确定研究重点（即，促进对研究工作将对社会产生广泛利益的领域达成共识）是帮助加速研究进展的关键方法。因此，在现有IR、数据简化的一般原则和适度中介的一般框架的基础上，本文确定了IR的四个优先领域、三个优先目标和四个可测试假设，我们将其组织在优先目标和可测试假设（PATH）图中。这一范围审查的目标是绘制出迄今为止，适宜卫生技术方案研究所审查确定的适宜卫生技术优先事项的程度。我们的样本将包括在创刊至2020年12月期间发表在以实施为重点的领先期刊（即《实施科学》、《实施科学通讯》和《实施研究与实践》）上的IR。当前范围审查和证据图的方案是根据Arksey和O 'Malley开发的方法制定的，并由Levac、Colquhoun和O 'Brien改进。由于范围评估旨在提供已确定证据基础的概述，而不是综合跨研究的发现，我们计划使用我们的数据图表形式提供迄今为止实施研究的描述性概述，并通过一个或多个汇总表总结研究。我们将使用适宜卫生路径图来组织迄今为止的证据地图。这一范围审查和证据图旨在帮助加速IR侧重于建议的优先目标和可测试的假设，这反过来将加速IR发展国家科学院定义的科学理论，并随后改善公共卫生。开放科学框架https://osf.io/3vhuj/
The challenge of implementing evidence-based innovations within practice settings is a significant public health issue that the field of implementation research (IR) is focused on addressing. Significant amounts of funding, time, and effort have been invested in IR to date, yet there remains significant room for advancement, especially regarding IR’s development of scientific theories as defined by the National Academy of Sciences (i.e., a comprehensive explanation of the relationship between variables that is supported by a vast body of evidence). Research priority setting (i.e., promoting consensus about areas where research effort will have wide benefits to society) is a key approach to helping accelerate research advancements. Thus, building upon existing IR, general principles of data reduction, and a general framework for moderated mediation, this article identifies four priority domains, three priority aims, and four testable hypotheses for IR, which we organize in the priority aims and testable hypotheses (PATH) diagram. The objective of this scoping review is to map the extent to which IR has examined the identified PATH priorities to date. Our sample will include IR published in leading implementation-focused journals (i.e., Implementation Science, Implementation Science Communications, and Implementation Research and Practice) between their inception and December 2020. The protocol for the current scoping review and evidence map has been developed in accordance with the approach developed by Arksey and O’Malley and advanced by Levac, Colquhoun, and O’Brien. Because scoping reviews seek to provide an overview of the identified evidence base rather than synthesize findings from across studies, we plan to use our data-charting form to provide a descriptive overview of implementation research to date and summarize the research via one or more summary tables. We will use the PATH diagram to organize a map of the evidence to date. This scoping review and evidence map is intended to help accelerate IR focused on suggested priority aims and testable hypotheses, which in turn will accelerate IR’s development of National Academy of Sciences-defined scientific theories and, subsequently, improvements in public health. Open Science Framework https://osf.io/3vhuj/
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
7.6
作者：
BARON, RM;KENNY, DA
通讯作者：
KENNY, DA
DOI：
10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t
发表时间：
1991-12-01
影响因子：
4.6
作者：
AJZEN, I
通讯作者：
AJZEN, I
DOI：
10.1186/1748-5908-4-50
发表时间：
2009-08-07
期刊：
Implementation science : IS
影响因子：
--
作者：
Damschroder LJ;Aron DC;Keith RE;Kirsh SR;Alexander JA;Lowery JC
通讯作者：
Lowery JC
影响因子：
11.3
作者：
Damschroder, Laura J.
通讯作者：
Damschroder, Laura J.
影响因子：
12.7
作者：
Glasgow, Russell E.;Vinson, Cynthia;Hunter, Christine
通讯作者：
Hunter, Christine