Early noun plurals in German: regularity, productivity or default?

Early noun plurals in German: regularity, productivity or default?
复制标题

德语早期名词复数:规律性、生产力还是默认?

DOI:
10.1017/s0305000906007379
复制
发表时间:
2006
影响因子:
2.2
通讯作者:
W. Dressler
W. Dressler
中科院分区:
人文科学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Sabine Laaha;D. Ravid;Katharina Korecky;G. Laaha;W. Dressler

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

在过去十年中,德语复数的收购一直是争议的焦点。在本文中,我们声称生产力程度(即名词形成潜在复数的能力)在决定习得速度方面起着关键作用。对84名2岁的维也纳德语儿童进行了多重引出任务;6 ~ 6;对正确答案的分析表明,-e复数得分最高,其次是-e +U、-er +U、-s和-(e)n。纯Umlaut (U)复数的得分最低。分析表明,生产力对正确分数的数量有影响:充分生产和生产的复数模式比弱生产和非生产的复数模式获得更高的正确分数。该研究的结果支持我们的生产力规模,并且与单路线模型和双路线视图的种族模型变体兼容。
The acquisition of German plurals has been the focus of controversy in the last decade. In this paper we claim that degree of productivity (i.e. the capacity of nouns to form potential plurals) plays a key role in determining pace of acquisition. A plural elicitation task was administered to 84 Viennese German-speaking children aged 2;6 to 6;0. Analyses of correct responses showed that the highest scores were obtained with -e plurals, followed by the plural markers -e +U, -er +U, -s and -(e)n. The lowest score was observed for pure Umlaut (U) plurals. Analyses suggested an impact of productivity on the number of correct scores: fully productive and productive plural patterns obtained higher correct scores than weakly productive and non-productive ones. The results of the study support our productivity scale and are compatible both with single-route models and with a race-model variant of the dual-route view.
DOI: 10.2307/1166115
发表时间: 1992
影响因子: 9.5
作者:
G. Marcus;S. Pinker;M. Ullman;Michelle A. Hollander;T. Rosen;Fei Xu;H. Clahsen
通讯作者: G. Marcus;S. Pinker;M. Ullman;Michelle A. Hollander;T. Rosen;Fei Xu;H. Clahsen