The strikethrough: an approach to regulatory writing and professional discipline
The strikethrough: an approach to regulatory writing and professional discipline
复制标题
删除线：监管写作和专业纪律的方法
DOI：
10.1111/lest.12142
复制
发表时间：
2018
期刊：
影响因子：
0.7
通讯作者：
Jacob M
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Jacob M
本文通过考察专业管理者如何参与医生进行的研究活动来关注写作实践。为了探索监管机构对被指控的研究不当行为的反应，我使用了研究人员和监管机构共享的特定书法实践。这篇论文表明，以这种书法实践为分析焦点，可以为跨领域的监管研究提供令人惊讶的红利。通过前线的做法，总医务委员会在从事研究活动时采取了三种姿态：展示、认证和隔离。理解它们需要问，划线的字面意义和隐喻意义是什么。
This paper attends to writing practices by way of examining how a professional regulator engages with research activities conducted by doctors. In order to explore regulatory responses to alleged research misconduct, I use a specific calligraphic practice shared by researchers and regulators. The paper shows that taking this calligraphic practice as an analytical focus can offer surprising dividends to the study of regulation across fields. Via the practice of strikethrough, the General Medical Council effectuates three gestures as it engages with research activities: display, authentication and isolation. Understanding them requires asking what literal and metaphorical meanings travel in the strikethrough.