Cross-cultural adaptation, translation, and validation of the Spanish Foot and Ankle Outcome Score questionnaire
Cross-cultural adaptation, translation, and validation of the Spanish Foot and Ankle Outcome Score questionnaire
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/iwj.13400
复制
发表时间：
2020-05-27
影响因子：
3.1
通讯作者：
Calvo-Lobo, Cesar
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Navarro-Flores, Emmanuel;Losa-Iglesias, Marta Elena;Calvo-Lobo, Cesar
西班牙足踝结局评分问卷（FAOS-S）可以被认为是一种健康评估工具，有42个问题用于评估足部健康障碍。迄今为止，FAOS已经以不同的语文得到验证，但缺乏西班牙文版本。因此，本研究的目的是翻译和验证FAOS的西班牙语版本（FAOS es）。一个合适的方法开发的翻译协议和跨文化验证从瑞典语到西班牙语。关于从每个领域的总成绩，协议度和信心进行了分析，分别使用Cronbach的α和组内相关系数。此外，使用Bland和Altman分布图计算并完成了试验前和试验后的平均值+/-SD差异。证明了基于Cronbach α的两个版本之间的良好一致性。将疼痛、足部疾病症状、日常生活活动、运动和娱乐以及足部和踝关节生活质量五个领域加在一起获得总分。总分具有良好的重测信度。疼痛、僵硬、其他足部疾病相关症状和生活质量领域的测试/重测信度非常好。各领域之间无显著性差异（P>.05）。测试前和测试后的平均值+/-SD差异（分别为56.2524 +/-19.064 [51.98 - 60.52]和57.45 +/-21.02 [52.74 - 62.16]分）无统计学显著性差异（P = 0.000）。Bland和Altman图或临床相关变异无统计学显著差异。FAOS被认为是一个强有力的和有效的问卷，在西班牙社区有足够的重复性。
The Spanish Foot and Ankle Outcome Score questionnaire (FAOS-S) may be considered a health evaluation tool with 42 questions for assessing foot health disorders. To date, FAOS has been validated in different languages, but a Spanish version was lacking. Consequently, the purpose of this study was to translate and validate the Spanish version of the FAOS (FAOS es). A suitable method was developed for the translation protocol and cross-cultural validation from Swedish to Spanish. Regarding the total marks from each domain, agreement degrees and confidence were analysed using the Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation coefficient, respectively. In addition, the mean +/- SD differences between pretest and posttests were calculated and completed using of the Bland and Altman distribution plots. Excellent agreement between the two versions based on Cronbach's alpha was demonstrated. Five domains consisting of pain, symptoms of foot disorders, activities of daily living, sports and recreation, and foot and ankle quality of life were added together to obtain the total score. Excellent retest reliability was shown for the total score. Test/retest reliability was excellent for the pain, stiffness, other foot disorder-related symptoms, and quality of life domains. There were no significant differences among any domain (P > .05). There were no statistically significant differences (P = .000) for the mean +/- SD differences between pretest and posttests (56.2524 +/- 19.064 [51.98-60.52] and 57.45 +/- 21.02 [52.74-62.16] points, respectively). Bland and Altman plots or clinically pertinent variations were not statistically significantly different. The FAOS is considered a strong and valid questionnaire with adequate repeatability in the Spanish community.