Examining the basis for illusory recollection: The role of remember/know instructions
Examining the basis for illusory recollection: The role of remember/know instructions
复制标题
DOI：
10.3758/bf03193871
复制
发表时间：
2006-06-01
影响因子：
3.5
通讯作者：
McCabe, David R.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Geraci, Lisa;McCabe, David R.
奇怪的是，使用记住/知道范式来衡量回忆体验的研究表明，人们经常生动地记住从未发生过的事件，这种现象被称为虚幻回忆。两个实验测试的假设，错误的记忆反应，收敛联营公司，或迪斯/Roediger-MeDermott（DRM）范式，反映了准确的记忆的研究情节，而不是错误的回忆关键诱惑。为了验证这一假设，我们使用标准的记忆指令，强调回忆的研究背景，允许参与者使用周围的列表项的记忆作为回忆的证据，或者我们使用修改后的指令，不包括周围的列表项的记忆作为回忆的基础。结果表明，与标准的指令条件相比，修改后的指令选择性地减少了错误的记忆反应的报告，关键的诱惑，但不影响记忆反应的研究项目。相比之下，记住反应的关键诱惑不受指令条件，排除使用语音信息作为证据的记忆。这些结果表明，错误识别项目的记忆反应部分是由检索的研究项目，而不是虚幻的回忆的关键诱惑本身。他们进一步指出了指导在影响主观报告方面的重要性。
Curiously, studies using the remember/know paradigm to measure recollective experience show that people often vividly remember events that never occurred, a phenomenon referred to as illusory recollection. Two experiments tested the hypothesis that false remember responses in the converging associates, or Deese/Roediger-MeDermott (DRM) paradigm, reflect accurate memory for the study episode, rather than false recollection of critical lures. To test this hypothesis, we used standard remember instructions that emphasized recollection of the study context by allowing participants to use memory of surrounding list items as evidence for recollection, or we used modified instructions that did not include memory for surrounding list items as a basis for recollection. Results showed that, as compared with the standard instruction condition, the modified instructions selectively reduced reports of false remember responses to critical lures, but did not affect remember responses to studied items. By contrast, remember responses to critical lures were unaffected by an instruction condition that excluded the use of voice information as evidence for remembering. These results suggest that remember responses to falsely recognized items are driven partly by retrieval of studied items, rather than illusory recollection of the critical lures themselves. They further point to the importance of instructions in influencing subjective reports.