Outcome assessment of psychotherapy.
Outcome assessment of psychotherapy.
复制标题
心理治疗的结果评估。
DOI：
10.1037//0003-066x.51.10.1005
复制
发表时间：
1996
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
G. VandenBos
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
G. VandenBos
对心理治疗效果的评估一直是一个经过深入研究和广泛争论的话题，其现代形式可以追溯到 20 世纪 50 年代初。心理学家主要参与心理治疗实证评估的发展。美国心理协会在国家心理健康研究所的资助下，在 1958 年至 1966 年间举办了三场主要的心理治疗研究会议（Rubinstein & Parloff，1959；Shlien、Hunt、Matarazzo 和 Savage，1968；Strupp & Luborsky，1962）。这些会议帮助培养了一批研究人员来科学地检验心理治疗的过程和结果（Strupp，1993）。 Bergin 和 Garfield 以手册形式出版了对这一不断发展的研究领域的详细检查（参见 Bergin & Garfield, 1971, 1994; Garfield & Bergin, 1978, 1986）。到 1980 年，“心理治疗作为一种通用治疗过程，显然比不治疗更有效”这一说法代表了现有经验数据的广泛普遍共识（Luborsky、Singer 和 Luborsky， 1975；史密斯、格拉斯和米勒，1980；范登博斯和皮诺，1980；自那时以来，大多数心理治疗结果研究都探索了替代干预方案之间的比较有效性，和/或侧重于旨在解决特定目标症状或疾病的特定干预技术。（Lipsey 和 Wilson 1993）对一般心理干预的有效性进行了详细回顾——跨多种类型的干预，在不同的环境中，针对不同的行为。
The assessment of the outcome of psychotherapy has been a well-researched and well-debated topic, dating, in its modern form, from the early 1950s. Psychologists were centrally involved in developing the empirical evaluation of psychotherapy. The American Psychological Association, with funding from the National Institute of Mental Health, held three major psychotherapy research conferences between 1958 and 1966 (Rubinstein & Parloff, 1959; Shlien, Hunt, Matarazzo, & Savage, 1968; Strupp & Luborsky, 1962). These conferences helped to create a cadre of researchers to scientifically examine the process and outcome of psychotherapy (Strupp, 1993). Detailed examinations of this evolving area of research were published in handbook-form by Bergin and Garfield (cf. Bergin & Garfield, 1971, 1994; Garfield & Bergin, 1978, 1986).By 1980, the statement “psychotherapy, as a generic treatment process, is demonstrably more effective than no treatment” represented a broad general consensus of the available empirical data (Luborsky, Singer, & Luborsky, 1975; Smith & Glass, 1977; Smith, Glass, & Miller, 1980; VandenBos, 1986; VandenBos & Pino, 1980). Most psychotherapy outcome research since that time has explored the comparative effectiveness among alternative intervention options, and/or has focused on specific intervention techniques designed to address particular targeted symptoms or disorders.(Lipsey and Wilson 1993) presented a detailed review of the effectiveness of psychological interventions in general—across many types of interventions, in differing settings, with varied behaviors.