Does unconscious perception really exist? Continuing the ASSC20 debate.
Does unconscious perception really exist? Continuing the ASSC20 debate.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1093/nc/nix015
复制
发表时间：
2017
影响因子：
4.1
通讯作者：
Block N
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Peters MAK;Kentridge RW;Phillips I;Block N
在我们的ASSC 20研讨会上，“无意识感知真的存在吗？”，我们四个人问了一些关于所谓的无意识知觉现象的难题，在一些问题上意见不一致。这种分歧反映了研讨会的目标：不仅要聚集在一起讨论ASSC社区感兴趣的单一主题，而且要以公平和全面的方式代表关于这个有争议的主题的想法，意见和证据的异质性。这场争论的关键在很大程度上取决于争论的术语意味着什么，以及如何从经验上确定一个状态是否是无意识的。这些问题直接关系到我们所有研究意识的人，所以争取达成共识似乎符合我们的最佳利益。鉴于ASSC 20的对话，我们很高兴有机会解决一些更正式出现的微妙话题，并分享自会议以来我们所做的一些思考。为了反映围绕这一主题的思想和观点的异质性，我们将这一讨论分为四个不同的部分。
In our ASSC20 symposium,“Does unconscious perception really exist?”, the four of us asked some difficult questions about the purported phenomenon of unconscious perception, disagreeing on a number of points. This disagreement reflected the objective of the symposium: not only to come together to discuss a single topic of keen interest to the ASSC community, but to do so in a way that would fairly and comprehensively represent the heterogeneity of ideas, opinions, and evidence that exists concerning this contentious topic. The crux of this controversy rests in no small part on disagreement about what is meant by the terms of the debate and how to determine empirically whether a state is unconscious or not. These are issues that directly concern all of us who study consciousness, so it seems it would be in our best interest to strive for consensus. Given the conversation at ASSC20, we are pleased to have the opportunity to address some of the nuanced topics that arose more formally, and share some of the thinking we have done since the meeting. To reflect the heterogeneity of ideas and opinions surrounding this topic, we have organized this discussion into four distinct contributions.