PRETEXTUALITY AND PRETEXTUAL GAPS: ON DE/REFINING LINGUISTIC INEQUALITY

PRETEXTUALITY AND PRETEXTUAL GAPS: ON DE/REFINING LINGUISTIC INEQUALITY
复制标题

假文本性和假文本差距：论解/细化语言不平等

DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2002
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
J. Blommaert
J. Blommaert
中科院分区：
--
文献类型：
--
作者：
Katrijn Maryns;J. Blommaert

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

摘要 基于语言不平等研究的丰富传统，本文试图界定借口空缺现象，即人们在交际中期望的东西和人们在交际中能带来和使用的东西之间的社会锚定的、通常是看不见的差异。前文鸿沟指的是关于可说性的条件、获得这些条件的不同分布以及与这些差异有关的社会评价。我们将调查三组数据中的前文空白，所有这些数据都是经验性叙述的实例：寻求庇护者=叙述，来自刚果沙巴的手写生活史，以及在南非真相与和解委员会听证会期间产生的关于苦难的叙述。我们将试图展示关注语言资源和部署模式的细粒度语篇分析如何提炼现有的关于语言不平等的观点。 关键词：叙事、识字、不平等、比利时、刚果、南非。
Abstract Drawing on the rich tradition of investigations into linguistic inequality, this paper seeks to define the phenomenon of pretextual gaps, i.e. socially anchored and often invisible differences between what is expected in communication and what people can bring and deploy in communication. Pretextual gaps refer to conditions on sayability, differential distribution of access to these conditions, and social evaluations attached to such differences. We shall investigate pretextual gaps in three sets of data, all of them instances of experiential narration: Asylum seekers= narratives, hand-written life histories from Shaba, Congo, and narratives of suffering produced during the hearings of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission in South Africa. We will attempt to demonstrate how a fine-grained discourse analysis focused on linguistic resources and models of deployment can refine existing views on linguistic inequality. Keywords: Narrative, Literacy, Inequality, Belgium, Congo, South Africa.