Collaborating to restrict: a conversation analytic perspective on collaboration in design
Collaborating to restrict: a conversation analytic perspective on collaboration in design
复制标题
协作限制：设计协作的对话分析视角
DOI：
10.1080/15710882.2012.734827
复制
发表时间：
2012
期刊：
影响因子：
1.8
通讯作者：
Ben Matthews
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Trine Heinemann;Jeanette Landgrebe;Ben Matthews
本文应用会话分析的角度来说明研讨会参与者如何合作引入设计限制。虽然许多研讨会的活动是基于民主和平等的（高贵的）意识形态的基础上的斯堪的纳维亚传统的参与式设计和参与式创新，我们展示了这样的理想（S）可以在实践中被推翻，因为参与者面向一个更普遍的，international社会秩序中的协议和进步的偏好占上风。本文件将说明，从讲习班参与者的角度来看，协作如何不是确保每个人都平等地作出贡献，而是侧重于避免分歧和保持所从事活动的渐进性。反过来，我们认为，这种取向的参与者有一个限制性的影响，探索设计的替代方案，否则，在意识形态的基础上，旨在实现这一点的研讨会的可能性。
This paper applies a conversation analytic perspective to illustrate how workshop participants collaboratively introduce design restrictions. Whilst many workshop activities are grounded in the (noble) ideology of democracy and equality that underlies the Scandinavian tradition of participatory design and participatory innovation, we demonstrate how such ideal(s) can be overridden in practice, because participants orient to a more general, interactional social order in which the preference for agreement and progressivity prevails. The paper will illustrate how collaboration, from the perspective of the participants in workshops, is thus not about ensuring that everyone contributes equally, but is rather focused on avoiding disagreement and maintaining progressivity within the activity engaged in. In turn, we argue that this orientation by the participants has a restricting effect on the possibility of exploring design alternatives in workshops that are otherwise, on ideological grounds, designed to accomplish exactly that.